This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

Civil Rights
Police Negligence
Excessive Force

Adrian Vivas v. County of Riverside, Jose Lopez

Published: Jul. 2, 2020 | Result Date: Aug. 30, 2019 | Filing Date: Sep. 17, 2015 |

Case number: 5:15-cv-01912-MMM-KK Settlement –  $8,500,000

Judge

Virginia A. Phillips

Court

CD CA


Attorneys

Plaintiff

Dale K. Galipo
(Law Offices of Dale K. Galipo)

Renee V. Masongsong
(Law Offices of Dale K. Galipo)


Defendant

Arthur K. Cunningham
(Lewis, Brisbois, Bisgaard & Smith LLP)

James C. Packer
(Lewis, Brisbois, Bisgaard & Smith LLP)

Christopher D. Lockwood
(Arias & Lockwood APLC)


Experts

Plaintiff

Roger A. Clark
(police practices and procedures)

Sharon K. Kawai M.D.
(physical medicine and rehabilitation)

Marianne Inouye MBA
(economics)

Defendant

Michael E. Gold M.D., F.A.A.N.
(neurology)

Walter W. Strauser M.D.
(physical medicine and rehabilitation)

Behnush B. Mortimer
(physical medicine and rehabilitation)

Robert Fonzi
(police practices and procedures)

Heather H. Xitco
(accounting)

Doreen Casuto RN, MRA, CRRN, CCM
(life care planning)

Facts

Adrian Vivas filed a lawsuit against the County of Riverside claiming excessive force in connection with an officer-involved shooting.

Contentions

PLAINTIFF'S CONTENTIONS: Plaintiff alleged that the shooting was excessive and unreasonable because Vivas was unarmed and did not pose an immediate threat of death or serious bodily injury to any person at the time of the shooting. Plaintiff maintained the following claims for relief at the time of the mediation: excessive force pursuant to 42 U.S.C. Section 1983; denial of Medical Care pursuant to 42 U.S.C. Section 1983; Municipal Liability pursuant to 42 U.S.C. Section 1983 and Monell, including failure to train, ratification, and unconstitutional custom, practice and policy; battery; negligence, including negligent use of force and negligent pre-shooting tactics; violation of the Bane Act (California Civil Code Section 52.1).

DEFENDANT'S CONTENTIONS: Defendants denied plaintiff's allegations in their entirety.

Deputy Lopez claimed that he thought Vivas was reaching for his waistband at the time that he shot him and that he saw a dark object in Vivas' hand just before he shot.

Injuries

As a result of shooting, plaintiff Adrian Vivas suffered serious physical injuries, including paralysis. Vivas' injuries from the shooting also reduced his earning capacity.

Result

The case settled for $8,500,000 at mediation.

Other Information

MEDIATOR: Rick Copeland, Conflict Solutions Services.


#134962

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390