This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

Employment Law
Wage and Hour
Meal and Rest Period

Brent Anderson, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated v. The Sherwin-Williams Company and Does 1 to 100, inclusive

Published: Jul. 10, 2020 | Result Date: May 12, 2020 | Filing Date: Nov. 8, 2017 |

Case number: 5:17-cv-02459-FMO-SHK Settlement –  $3,650,000

Judge

Fernando M. Olguin

Court

Los Angeles County Superior Court


Attorneys

Plaintiff

Kevin T. Barnes
(Law Offices of Kevin T. Barnes)

Gregg Lander
(Law Offices of Kevin T. Barnes)

Raphael A. Katri
(Law Offices of Raphael A. Katri)

Robin G. Workman
(Workman Law Firm PC)

Rachel E. Davey
(Workman Law Firm PC)


Defendant

Margaret Rosenthal
(Baker & Hostetler LLP)

Shareef S. Farag
(Baker Hostetler LLP)

Nicholas D. Poper
(Baker & Hostetler LLP)


Facts

Brent Anderson and other hourly-paid employees that included store managers, assistant managers, and associates, filed a wage and hour class action lawsuit against The Sherwin-Williams Company.

Contentions

PLAINTIFFS' CONTENTIONS: Plaintiffs contended Defendant violated Labor Code Section 203 when Defendant failed to pay all of its employees' proper wages; proper overtime; and further failed to provide all meal periods. Plaintiffs further contended Defendant violated many derivative actions when it failed to timely furnish accurate itemized wage statements and failed to fully reimburse work-related expenses. Plaintiffs lastly contended Defendant violated the California Labor Code, and applicable Wage Orders issued by the California Industrial Welfare Commission when it failed to pay the class members all wages owed for all of the hours worked by the employees.

DEFENDANT'S CONTENTIONS: Defendant denied the contentions.

Result

The parties agreed to settle for $3.65 million including $912,500 in attorney's fees.


#134989

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390