This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

Employment Law
FEHA
Wrongful Termination

Jayme Tipton v. Airport Terminal Services, Inc., Edgar Trujillo, Melissa Doe, and Does 1 through 100

Published: Jun. 26, 2020 | Result Date: Apr. 27, 2020 | Filing Date: Nov. 8, 2018 |

Case number: 2:18-cv-09503-AB-JEM Summary Judgment –  Defense

Judge

Andre Birotte Jr.

Court

CD CA


Attorneys

Plaintiff

Carney R. Shegerian
(Shegerian & Associates Inc.)

Aaron G. Gbewonyo
(Shegerian & Associates Inc.)

Anthony Nguyen
(Shegerian & Associates Inc.)


Defendant

Aaron R. Lubeley
(Seyfarth Shaw LLP)

Meagan S. O'Dell
(Seyfarth Shaw LLP)

Simon Lee Yang
(Diversity Law Group PC)


Facts

Plaintiff Jayme Tipton was working as a Groomer to perform housekeeping duties on planes for defendant Airport Terminal Services, Inc. Plaintiff sued defendant alleging wrongful termination.

Contentions

PLAINTIFF'S CONTENTIONS: Plaintiff contended she suffered an injury while performing housekeeping duties on a plane. Plaintiff informed her supervisor, Damian Neri, of her injury and her intent to seek medical treatment. Plaintiff went to see a doctor who diagnosed her with a tear in her rotator cuff and placed her on leave. Plaintiff alleged she received a phone call from a human resources representative telling her ATS needed to fill her position and requesting plaintiff to voluntarily resign from her position at ATS. Plaintiff refused and several days later received a letter terminating her. Plaintiff's replacement was not hired until two months after her employment was terminated.
Plaintiff asserted claims for violation of the Fair Employment and Housing Act; breach of contract; negligent hiring, supervision, and retention; wrongful termination in violation of public policy; and intentional infliction of emotional distress.

DEFENDANT'S CONTENTIONS: Defendant denied the allegations and removed the action based on diversity of jurisdiction. Defendant further moved for summary judgment.

Result

The court found that plaintiff presented no triable issues of material fact and that defendant was entitled to judgment as a matter of law. Judgment was entered in defendant's favor.


#135030

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390