This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

Civil Rights
42 U.S.C. Section 1983
Unlawful Incarceration Without Due Process

Tureko Straughter, individually and as the guardian for minor K.R.; and K.R, a minor, by and through his guardian Tureko Straughter v. City and County of San Francisco, San Francisco Juvenile Probation Department, Chief of San Francisco Juvenile Probation Department Allen Nance, Deputy Probation Officer Samuel Nwigwe, Deputy Probation Officer Toni Powell, Deputy Probation Officer Roger Gainey, and Does 1-30, inclusive

Published: Aug. 7, 2020 | Result Date: Feb. 4, 2020 | Filing Date: Jun. 19, 2018 |

Case number: 3:18-cv-03651 Settlement –  $160,000

Judge

Alex G. Tse

Court

USDC Northern District of California


Attorneys

Plaintiff

Meredith Desautels
(Bay Area Legal Aid)


Defendant

Cheryl S. Adams
(Office of the San Francisco City Attorney)


Facts

Tureko Straughter's son, K.R., was a minor when San Francisco police detained him for alleged auto burglary. K.R. was eventually granted a release order from the court, however juvenile authorities did not release K.R. until three days after the order was granted. K.R. eventually sued the police department and chief for his detention.

Contentions

PLAINTIFF'S CONTENTIONS: Plaintiff contended that defendants disobeyed a court order to release plaintiff from custody and therefore falsely imprisoned plaintiff for each day in custody after the order. Plaintiff further contended that defendant allowed plaintiff very little time outside the cell and restricted contact with his family. Plaintiff further contended that the conditions defendants placed plaintiff in left plaintiff with a lack of appetite and need for companionship with plaintiff.

DEFENDANTS' CONTENTIONS: Defendants denied the contentions.

Result

The parties entered a $160,000 settlement agreement.


#135085

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390