This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

Government
Social Security Administration
Supplemental Security Income and Child Disability Benefits

Jeryka Ann Johnson v. Andrew M. Saul

Published: Aug. 21, 2020 | Result Date: Jun. 12, 2020 | Filing Date: Oct. 18, 2019 |

Case number: 19-cv-06454 Summary Judgment –  Plaintiff

Judge

Vince G. Chhabria

Court

USDC Northern District of California


Attorneys

Plaintiff

Brian Cameron Fraser
(Homeless Action Center)


Defendant

In Seon Jeong
(Social Security Administration)

Sara Winslow
(Office of the U.S. Attorney)

Gina Tomaselli
(Office of the U.S. Attorney)


Facts

Plaintiff Jeryka Johnson sought judicial review of a final decision by the Commissioner of Social Security who denied Plaintiff's application for Disability Insurance Benefits and Supplemental Security Income.

Contentions

PLAINTIFF'S CONTENTIONS: Plaintiff alleged she suffered from severe seizures. Plaintiff contended the administrative law judge improperly discounted the opinions of Plaintiff's two treating physicians. Plaintiff further contended the ALJ purported to give partial weight to the opinion of Dr. Laxer, but rejected Dr. Laxer's conclusion that Johnson had an average of five seizures per week and typically needed to test the entire day after a seizure.

DEFENDANT'S CONTENTIONS: Defendant denied Plaintiff's contentions and contended Dr. Laxter's opinion was discounted since most of Plaintiff's seizures were self-reported, rather than medically documented, and because Plaintiff's seizures were small and frequently occurred during her sleep, which didn't interfere with Plaintiff's work ability. Defendant additionally contended Dr. Laxer's opinion was discounted with regard to Plaintiff's alleged large, grand mal seizures, because Plaintiff's symptoms rarely occurred when she took her medication.

Result

Plaintiff's motion for summary judgment was granted because the court found that Defendant's reasons fell short of the specific and legitimate standard. The record did not establish that Plaintiff's seizures only occurred at night and did not interfere with her workday. Moreover, the court found that the ALJ failed to consider the appropriate factors when determining the weight accorded to Dr. Laxer.


#135199

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390