Maria V. v. Andrew M. Saul
Published: Jul. 31, 2020 | Result Date: Jun. 12, 2020 |Case number: 2:19-cv-02586-GJS Summary Judgment – Defense
Judge
Court
CD CA
Attorneys
Plaintiff
Olivia Sanders
(Law Office of Olivia Sanders)
Defendant
Stacy E. Wiesbrock
(Social Security Administration)
Facts
Plaintiff Maria V. sought judicial review of the Commissioner of Social Security's decision, denying her application for Disability Insurance Benefits.
Contentions
PLAINTIFF'S CONTENTIONS: Plaintiff alleged she suffered from back pain, diabetes, high blood pressure, and hypercholesterolemia. Plaintiff contended the administrative law judge erred when it determined she was not disabled because the ALJ determined plaintiff suffered from degenerative disc disease of the lumbar spinal and thoracic spinal areas and obesity. Plaintiff additionally contended the ALJ improperly considered her treatment records produced by her treating physician; failed to properly assess her Residual Functional Capacity and find her diabetes as a severe impairment; and erroneously concluded plaintiff could have performed other work, which was was not supported by substantial evidence in the record.
DEFENDANT'S CONTENTIONS: Defendant denied the contentions and contended plaintiff was not disabled because she did not have an impairment or combination of impairments that met or medically equaled the severity of a listed medical condition. Defendant contended plaintiff could have performed other work.
Result
The court granted defendant's motion for summary judgment in concluding that plaintiff failed to meet her burden that established she was severely impaired from her alleged impediments.
For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:
Email
jeremy@reprintpros.com
for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390