This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

Employment Law
Retaliation
Sexual Harassment

Rosalinda Kornegay v. City of Los Angeles and Bernard Wilder

Published: Aug. 14, 2020 | Result Date: Feb. 19, 2020 |

Case number: BC667056 Verdict –  Defense

Judge

Michelle Williams Court

Court

Los Angeles County Superior Court


Attorneys

Plaintiff

Angel J. Horacek
(Law Offices of Angel J. Horacek, PC)

Martin R. Berman
(Law Office of Pflaster & Berman)

William W. Bloch
(William W. Bloch & Associates)


Defendant

Robert B. Charboneau
(Law Office of Robert B. Charboneau )

Erin E. Uyeshima
(Vanderford & Ruiz LLP)

Rodolfo F. Ruiz
(Vanderford & Ruiz LLP)

Todd A. Picker
(Vanderford & Ruiz, LLP)


Facts

Rosalinda Kornegay was a Los Angeles International Airport security officer and sued her employer, the City of Los Angeles and Sergeant Bernard Wilder, after being reassigned to a new position.

Contentions

PLAINTIFF'S CONTENTIONS: Plaintiff contended that defendant Wilder made inappropriate comments towards plaintiff during roll call, which addressed rumors that plaintiff was dating a lieutenant. Plaintiff also contended that she received inappropriate letters, calling plaintiff offensive names. Plaintiff further contended that she submitted complaints regarding these incidents and that after, she was denied a position as lead officer. Plaintiff also contended that defendants intentionally transferred her to a position below her current rank in retaliation for plaintiff's complaints. Plaintiff also contended that she was verbally harassed when she took her new position. Plaintiff's expert also contended that plaintiff suffered from emotional pain and suffering as a result of defendants' conduct.

DEFENDANTS' CONTENTIONS: Defendants contended that plaintiff's claims of gossip and harassment were not substantiated by any supervisors. Defendants also contended that defendant Wilder's statements at the meeting were an attempt to put a general end to the harassment in the department without using any individual names. Defendants further contended that defendant Wilder did not intend to use plaintiff's name and as a result did not create a hostile or harassing work environment. Defendants denied the contention that plaintiff was retaliated against and instead contended that a full investigation and subsequent remedial measures were taken after plaintiff's complaint was made. Defendants further contended that the application process for the position plaintiff sought was frozen and, at her request, plaintiff was placed in a suitable alternative position instead.

Damages

Plaintiff sought $4 million in damages from the City of Los Angeles and another $150,000 from Sergeant Wilder for her claimed emotional pain and suffering.

Result

The jury returned a verdict in favor of defendants.

Other Information

The court denied plaintiff's motion for a judgment notwithstanding the verdict and a new trial.

Length

3 weeks.


#135254

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390