This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

Torts
Negligence
Negligent Infliction of Emotional Distress

Michael Austin, Wyonnie Austin, Kenneth Nickens and Lucille Nickens v. Princess Cruise Lines Ltd.

Published: Aug. 28, 2020 | Result Date: Jul. 14, 2020 | Filing Date: Mar. 17, 2020 |

Case number: 2:20-cv-02531-RGK-SK Bench Decision –  Dismissal

Judge

R. Gary Klausner

Court

CD CA


Attorneys

Plaintiff

Debi F. Chalik
(Chalik & Chalik PA)

Michael A. Simmrin
(Simmrin Law Group)


Defendant

Jeffrey B. Maltzman
(Maltzman & Partners PA)

Gabrielle DeSantis-Nield
(Maltzman & Partners PA)

Edgar R. Nield
(Maltzman & Partners PA)

Rafaela P. Castells
(Maltzman & Partners PA)


Facts

Plaintiffs Michael Austin, Wyonnie Austin, Kenneth Nickens and Lucille Nickens filed a lawsuit against Princess Cruise Lines, Ltd. alleging negligence for defendant's failure to have proper screening protocols for COVID-19 when plaintiffs were aboard the Grand Princess on February 21, 2020.

Contentions

PLAINTIFF'S CONTENTIONS: Plaintiffs contended that defendant was negligent because it failed to have proper procedures in place aboard the Grand Princess Cruise ship in order to minimize the risk of its passengers' exposure to the virus. Plaintiffs contended that defendant did not inform plaintiffs prior to boarding the cruise ship that there was actual risk of contracting COVID-19 on board. Further, plaintiffs contended that had they known of such risk they would not have boarded the ship. Plaintiffs contended that they suffered severe emotional distress due to defendant's negligence.

DEFENDANT'S CONTENTIONS: Defendant denied plaintiff's contentions. Defendant contended that plaintiff failed to allege sufficient facts to prove that they were at risk of contracting COVID-19.

Result

The court granted defendant's motion to dismiss plaintiff's complaint.


#135302

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390