This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

Government
Social Security Administration
Disability Insurance Benefits

Timothy P. v. Andrew M. Saul

Published: Oct. 2, 2020 | Result Date: Jul. 14, 2020 | Filing Date: Jul. 10, 2019 |

Case number: 19-cv-03976-EMC Summary Judgment –  Plaintiff

Judge

Edward M. Chen

Court

USDC Northern District of California


Attorneys

Plaintiff

Harvey P. Sackett
(Sackett & Associates APLC)


Defendant

S. Wyeth McAdam
(Social Security Administration)

Allison J. Cheung
(Social Security Administration)


Facts

Plaintiff Timothy P. filed a lawsuit against the Commissioner of Social Security, Andrew M. Saul, seeking to reverse a prior decision of an administrative law judge denying his disability insurance benefits under Title II of the Social Security Act.

Contentions

PLAINTIFF'S CONTENTIONS: Plaintiff, 50, had filed an application contending he was disabled because he suffered from agoraphobia, bilateral carpal tunnel syndrome, depression, and impaired cervical discs, which was denied by an ALJ. Years later, Plaintiff filed another application contending he was disabled because he suffered from borderline intellectual functioning, rheumatoid arthritis, emphysema, high blood pressure, and cholesterol. Plaintiff contended that the ALJ erred by improperly applying res judicata because he showed a changed circumstance, rebutting the presumption of nondisability. Plaintiff also contended the ALJ erred in improperly rejecting the medical opinion of his treating physician.

DEFENDANT'S CONTENTIONS: Defendant denied the contentions and relied on the ALJ's determination that res judicata applied because plaintiff did not overcome the presumption of continuing nondisability.

Result

The court granted plaintiff's motion for summary judgment because it found that his diagnosis of borderline intellectual functioning was a changed circumstance, rebutting the presumption of continuing nondisability.


#135375

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390