This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

Personal Injury
Dangerous Condition of Public Property
Trip and Fall

Margaret Hardgrave v. Ramallah Club Inc., City and County of San Francisco, and Does 1 - 20, inclusive

Published: Aug. 28, 2020 | Result Date: Jul. 21, 2020 | Filing Date: Nov. 14, 2018 |

Case number: CGC-18-571308 Settlement –  $75,000

Judge

Garrett L. Wong

Court

San Francisco County Superior Court


Attorneys

Plaintiff

James F. Waite
(Law Offices of Christian B. Green)

Edward C. Casey Jr.
(Law Offices of Edward C. Casey, Jr.)


Defendant

James F. Hannawalt
(Office of the San Francisco City Attorney)

Christopher J. Nevis
(Lewis, Brisbois, Bisgaard & Smith LLP)

Matthew S. Pascale
(Lewis, Brisbois, Bisgaard & Smith LLP)


Facts

Plaintiff Margaret Hardgrave filed a lawsuit against defendants Ramallah Club Inc., and the City and County of San Francisco, in relation to alleged personal injuries that arose on a city sidewalk. Plaintiff asserted causes of action for negligence and premises liability.

Contentions

PLAINTIFF'S CONTENTIONS: Plaintiff contended Defendant City and County of San Francisco caused Plaintiff's injuries because it failed to address and remedy two different uneven and uplifted parts of the public sidewalk. Plaintiff contended the consecutive trips from the uneven pavement caused her to lose balance, fall into the street and onto Plaintiff's face.

DEFENDANTS' CONTENTIONS: Defendants denied Plaintiff's contentions. Defendant San Francisco filed a motion for summary judgment based on the defense that the small uplift caused by a tree root was a trivial defect entitling it to a defense award as a matter of law. Defendant San Francisco contended it was entitled to immunity and could not be sued as a public entity.

Result

The court granted San Francisco summary adjudication on the general negligence claim because there was no evidence it owned the property adjacent to the public sidewalk. However, as to the premises liability cause of action, the court determined that because there were two uplifts, not just one, the matter should be submitted to a jury trial rather than decided by the court and denied summary adjudication on that claim. The parties then entered into a settlement agreement for $75,000.


#135389

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390