This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

Personal Injury
Dangerous Condition of Public Property
Trip and Fall

Bobby James v. City and County of San Francisco, Does 1 to 10, inclusive

Published: Sep. 11, 2020 | Result Date: Jul. 24, 2020 | Filing Date: Aug. 2, 2016 |

Case number: CGC-16-553408 Summary Judgment –  Defense

Judge

Richard B. Ulmer Jr.

Court

San Francisco County Superior Court


Attorneys

Plaintiff

Brian L. Larsen
(Law Offices of Brian L. Larsen)


Defendant

Ryan Christopher Stevens
(Office of the San Francisco City Attorney)


Facts

On October 18, 2015, plaintiff Bobby James was walking on Third Street in San Francisco when he tripped on a hole on the ground where a meter used to stand which evidently caused him injuries. Plaintiff sued defendant the City and County of San Francisco for personal injury under a premises liability theory.

Contentions

PLAINTIFF'S CONTENTIONS: Plaintiff contended that defendants were negligent for failing to maintain and fix an open hole on the ground where a meter used to be. Plaintiff contended that it should have been reasonably foreseeable to defendants that the public including plaintiff would be injured by the open hole.

DEFENDANT'S CONTENTIONS: Defendant denied plaintiff's contentions. Defendant contended it had no notice of the condition.

Result

The court granted defendant's motion for summary judgment because plaintiff failed to show that defendant created the condition and plaintiff also failed to show that defendant had sufficient time to take protective measures to fix the hole because plaintiff's testimony that he did not see the hole there five days prior suggested that it was of short duration and would not have been noted by periodic inspection.


#135429

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390