This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

Antitrust
False Claims Act
Anti-Kickback Statute

United States of America and the State of California ex rel. Laurie M. Hanvey v. Sutter Health, Sutter Health Sacramento Sierra Region d/b/a Sutter Medical Center, Sacramento, a/k/a Sutter Roseville Medical Center, a/k/a Sutter Amador Hospital, a/k/a Sutter Auburn Faith Hospital, a/k/a Sutter Davis Hospital, a/k/a Sutter Solano Medical Center; Sutter Medical Foundation; Sutter East Bay Hospitals d/b/a Alta Bates Summit Medical Center, a/k/a Sutter Delta Medical Center; East Bay Perinatal Center d/b/a Alta Bates Summit Perinatal Center; East Bay Cardiac Surgery Center Medical Group; Sutter Medical Center, Castro Valley d/b/a Eden Medical Center; Eden Medical Center, d/b/a San Leandro Hospital; Sutter East Bay Medical Foundation; Sutter Central Valley Hospitals d/b/a Memorial Medical Center, a/k/a Memorial Hospital Los Banos, a/k/a Sutter Tracy Community Hospital; Sutter Gould Medical Foundation; Sutter Connect LLC d/b/a Sutter Physicians Services; Sutter Medical Group; Sutter Independent Physicians; East Bay Physicians Medical Group Inc.; Sacramento Cardiovascular Surgeons Medical Group Inc.; East Bay Perinatal Medical Associates; Bay Area Surgical Specialists Inc., f/k/a East Bay Vascular Group; Stephen K. Liu, M.D.; California Emergency Physicians Medical Group f/k/a Sutter Emergency Medical Associates

Published: Sep. 11, 2020 | Result Date: Nov. 15, 2019 | Filing Date: Sep. 10, 2014 |

Case number: 4:14-cv-04100-KAW Settlement –  $30,500,000

Judge

Kandis A. Westmore

Court

USDC Northern District of California


Attorneys

Plaintiff

Kimberly Friday
(Office of the U.S. Attorney)

Elizabeth S. Voorhies
(Office of the Attorney General)


Defendant

Katherine A. Lauer
(Latham & Watkins LLP)


Facts

The Physician Self-Referral Law also known as the Stark Law bans hospitals from billing Medicare for services referred by physicians with whom that hospital has a business relationship with subject to a few exemptions. Relator Laurie M. Hanvey filed a lawsuit on behalf of the United States of America and State of California against defendants Sutter Health and Sutter Health Sacramento Sierra Region doing business as Sutter Memorial Center Sacramento alleging that defendants violated the Stark Law and the False Claims Act.

Contentions

PLAINTIFF'S CONTENTIONS: Plaintiffs contended that defendants engaged in fraud in violation of the Stark Law by devising a scheme where they entered into compensation arrangements with Sacramento-based physicians and paid these physicians unlawful kickbacks and compensation exceeding the fair market value of services, then billing Medicare. Plaintiffs contended that defendants thereby submitted false and fraudulent claims to Medicare.

DEFENDANTS' CONTENTIONS: Defendant denied plaintiff's contentions.

Result

Defendant Sutter Memorial Center Sacramento agreed to settle the case for $30.5 million.


#135454

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390