This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

Employment Law
Breach of Contract
Wrongful Termination

Gary L. Greenberg, M.D. v. Contra Costa Regional Medical Center, Staff Care Inc., et al.

Published: Sep. 4, 2020 | Result Date: May 28, 2020 | Filing Date: Jul. 12, 2018 |

Case number: MSC18-01367 Summary Judgment –  Defense

Judge

Jill Fannin (Ret.)

Court

Contra Costa County Superior Court


Attorneys

Plaintiff

Robin M. Pearson
(Ropers Majeski)


Defendant

Cheryl A. Stevens
(Lafayette & Kumagai LLP) for Staff Care Inc.


Facts

On June 30, 2011, plaintiff Gary L. Greenberg, an anesthesiologist entered into a contract with defendant Staff Care, Inc., a healthcare staffing agency. Under the contract entitled "Provider Services Agreement" plaintiff agreed to provide medical services to hospitals that were under contract with defendant. Pursuant to the agreement, plaintiff was assigned to work at Contra Costa Regional Medical Center. However, plaintiff's assignment was terminated after CCRMC's Chair of Anesthesiology, Jeffrey Saadi complained of plaintiff's performance. Plaintiff sued defendants Staff Care, Inc., CCRMC and Saadi for breach of contract.

Contentions

PLAINTIFF'S CONTENTIONS: Plaintiff contended that defendant breached the "Provider Services Agreement."

DEFENDANTS' CONTENTIONS: Defendant denied plaintiff's contentions. First, defendant contended that plaintiff failed to identify the provision in the "Provider Services Agreement" that plaintiff claimed defendant breached. Second, defendant argued that plaintiff's termination was predicated upon plaintiff's incompetency, which was a condition in the agreement that warranted removal and termination. Defendant provided evidence that plaintiff failed to focus on patient care. Finally, defendant contended that plaintiff was not an intended third party beneficiary to the contract between CCRMC and defendant.

Result

Defendant Staff Care, Inc.'s motion for summary judgment was granted.


#135467

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390