This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

Government
Social Security Administration
Disability Insurance Benefits

Dennis Clausen v. Andrew M. Saul

Published: Oct. 9, 2020 | Result Date: Aug. 5, 2020 | Filing Date: Oct. 29, 2019 |

Case number: SACV 19-02061-AS Summary Judgment –  Defense

Judge

Alka Sagar

Court

CD CA


Attorneys

Plaintiff

Young C. Cho
(Law Offices of Lawrence D. Rohlfing)


Defendant

Lynn M. Harada
(Social Security Administration)


Facts

Plaintiff Dennis C., sought judicial review of a final decision by the Commissioner of Social Security denying plaintiff's application for disability insurance benefits under Title XVI of the Social Security Act.

Contentions

PLAINTIFF'S CONTENTIONS: Plaintiff, formerly employed as a sales associate at Wal-Mart, alleged he became disabled on February 16, 2016 from lumbar spine degenerative disc disease and status post-surgery. Plaintiff contended he was treated by Tien T. Nguyen, M.D., who performed the surgery on plaintiff and indicated that plaintiff generally used a brace between March 2016 and June 2017, and also used a cane through June. Thus, plaintiff contended the ALJ erred when it improperly evaluated his subjective symptom testimony and determined he was not disabled. Specifically, plaintiff contended the ALJ failed to provide clear and convincing reasons as to why it rejected his subjective symptom testimony.

DEFENDANT'S CONTENTIONS: Defendant denied the contentions. Defendant contended plaintiff was able to perform past work as a sales attendant. Further, defendant contended plaintiff's testimony about the intensity, persistence and limiting effects of his pain and symptoms were inconsistent with the medical evidence and other evidence submitted.

Result

The court granted summary judgment for defendant, finding it offered clear and convincing reasons for discounting plaintiff's subjective testimony.


#135544

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390