This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

Civil Rights
Excessive Force
Wrongful Death

Victor Reyes, individually and as successor-in-interest to Michael Lopez v. City of Torrance

Published: Oct. 23, 2020 | Result Date: Jun. 8, 2020 | Filing Date: Nov. 9, 2018 |

Case number: 18STCV04484 Settlement –  $200,000

Judge

Deirdre H. Hill

Court

Los Angeles County Superior Court


Attorneys

Plaintiff

Michael S. Carrillo
(Carrillo Law Firm LLP)

Luis A. Carrillo
(Carrillo Law Firm LLP)


Defendant

Mildred K. O'Linn
(Manning & Kass, Ellrod, Ramirez, Trester LLP)

Angela M. Powell
(Atkinson, Andelson, Loya, Ruud & Romo)


Facts

On October 14, 2017, Torrance police officers were in pursuit of Michael Lopez. While in pursuit, officers tried a pursuit intervention technique twice to force Lopez to lose control of his vehicle. Ultimately, the officers fired 23 gun shots at Lopez while he was in his vehicle, which eventually stopped on South Sepulveda Boulevard. Lopez died at the scene and his father, Victor Reyes, sued the City of Torrance for his son's death.

Contentions

PLAINTIFF'S CONTENTIONS: Plaintiffs contended that defendants used excessive force in pursuing Lopez. Plaintiffs contended that the excessive use of force was due to defendants' negligent training of their officers. Plaintiff contended that it was a low-speed pursuit, that Lopez did not hit any pedestrians or structures, and Lopez was unarmed and therefore, the officers were not justified in discharging 23 shots at him.

DEFENDANTS' CONTENTIONS: Defendants denied the contentions and contended that the PIT was used twice on plaintiff, who accelerated to speeds up to 85 mph after the first attempted PIT. Moreover, the high speeds on surface streets with multiple red-light violations suggested Lopez was under the influence, which further justified officers' actions at the scene. Lastly, defendants contended that Lopez revved his engine while his vehicle was facing defendants after the second PIT. As a result, defendants contended that their actions were taken in self-defense and the use of force was lawful.

Result

The parties agreed to a $200,000 pre-trial settlement that would be paid to plaintiff entirely by the City.


#135716

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390