This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

Employment Law
ERISA
Breach of Fiduciary Duty

Robin Goolsby, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated v. Anthem Inc., Anthem UM Services Inc.

Published: Nov. 13, 2020 | Result Date: Sep. 28, 2020 | Filing Date: Jan. 17, 2019 |

Case number: 2:19-cv-00392-DSF-KS Settlement –  Injunctive Relief

Judge

Dale S. Fischer

Court

CD CA


Attorneys

Plaintiff

Robert S. Gianelli
(Gianelli & Morris ALC)

Joshua S. Davis
(Gianelli & Morris ALC)

Adrian J. Barrio
(Gianelli & Morris ALC)

Howard L. Rose
(Gianelli & Morris ALC)


Defendant

Michelle L. Cheng
(Reed Smith LLP)

Jonathan D. Gershon
(Reed Smith LLP)


Facts

Plaintiff Robin Goolsby filed a class action lawsuit on behalf of herself and others, against Defendants Anthem, Inc. and Anthem UM Services, Inc. Defendant Anthem was one of the largest health care companies that owned subsidiaries, including Anthem UM Services, which acted as a fully integrated company that insured and administered Health Care Plans. Most of the administered Heath Care Plans were employer sponsored and governed by the authority of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, also known as ERISA. Plaintiff alleged that Defendants improperly denied claims for surgical treatment of lipedema made by Anthem members.

Contentions

PLAINTIFF'S CONTENTIONS: Plaintiff contended at all relevant times she was covered under Anthem through her employer Verizon, and when she was diagnosed with stage 3 lipedema, Defendant refused to provide treatment for tumescent liposuction and other related dealings that would have treated Plaintiff's stage 3 lipedema. Plaintiff contended surgical treatment of Lipedema was not considered an optional cosmetic surgery, rather it was a required and mandated procedure covered under the policy to help improve the covered members health.

DEFENDANTS' CONTENTIONS: Defendants denied Plaintiff's contentions and contended surgical treatment of lipedema was considered cosmetic surgery and thus not covered or mandated under the health insurance policy.

Result

The parties entered into a settlement agreement which included a change in Anthem's coverage position on claims for liposuction to treat lipedema, provided for the re-processing of previously denied claims under a new guideline, and required Anthem to pay $434,500.00 in attorney fees and costs.


#135934

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390