This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

Personal Injury
Premises Liability
Trip and Fall

Alicia Arredondo v. Pacific Bell Telephone Company; AT&T Inc.; AT&T Teleholdings Inc.; City of South San Francisco, and Does 1 through 20, inclusive

Published: Nov. 13, 2020 | Result Date: Oct. 2, 2020 | Filing Date: Jul. 2, 2019 |

Case number: 19-CIV-03797 Summary Judgment –  Defense

Judge

Nancy L. Fineman

Court

San Mateo County Superior Court


Attorneys

Plaintiff

William C. Johnson
(Bennett & Johnson LLP)

Andrew L. Johnson
(Bennett & Johnson LLP)


Defendant

Todd H. Master
(Howard, Rome, Martin & Ridley LLP)

Shawn M. Ridley
(Howard, Rome, Martin & Ridley LLP)


Facts

On June 8, 2018, as plaintiff Alicia Arredondo was walking along the sidewalk of the north side of the 1200 block of El Camino Real in South San Francisco, she tripped and fell over an unsecured metal cover for an underground utility vault. The steel grate covered an opening to access underground telephone equipment owned by defendant Pacific Bell Telephone Company. Plaintiff sued both defendants the City of South San Francisco and PacBell for her injuries resulting from the fall.

Contentions

PLAINTIFF'S CONTENTIONS: Plaintiff contended that the City owned, operated, and controlled the metal vault and steel grate covering within the public sidewalk. Plaintiff alleged that the City was liable for her injuries resulting from the trip and fall because it was caused by a dangerous condition of public property. Moreover, plaintiff alleged that the City was negligent for failing to properly supervise and maintained the metal vault in the public sidewalk.

DEFENDANT'S CONTENTIONS: Defendant the City denied plaintiff's contentions. Defendant contended it should not be liable for the metal vault because the City did not own, control or maintain the alleged dangerous condition. In support of its motion for summary judgment, the City provided defendant PacBell's discovery responses where PacBell admitted that it owned, maintained and controlled the metal vault. Lastly, the City contended that because it did own, control or maintain the metal vault, it had no duty to repair a privately owned property and as such had no power to remedy against a dangerous condition on property owned by PacBell.

Result

The court granted defendant the City's motion for summary judgment.


#135948

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390