Anthony R. Flores v. Wells Fargo Bank N.A., et al.
Published: Nov. 6, 2020 | Result Date: Sep. 29, 2020 | Filing Date: Jun. 10, 2020 |Case number: 2:20-cv-01162-KJM-CKD PS Bench Decision – Defense
Judge
Court
USDC Eastern District of California
Attorneys
Plaintiff
Defendant
Michael Rapkine
(Anglin, Flewelling, Rasmussen, Campbell & Trytten LLP)
Facts
Plaintiff Anthony Flores obtained a loan of $153,750 from World Savings Bank secured with a mortgage on a property located in Paradise, California. World Savings later changed its name to Wachovia Mortgage and eventually was acquired by defendant Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. During the term of the loan, plaintiff began receiving mortgage statements from Wells Fargo Home Mortgage to which he paid. In November 2018, the property was destroyed due to a fire and plaintiff received insurance proceeds to which he then transferred to Wells Fargo to pay off the note and mortgage. Plaintiff sued Wells Fargo for the payments.
Contentions
PLAINTIFF'S CONTENTIONS: Plaintiff contended that Wells Fargo was not the true beneficiary of the loan and that Wells Fargo fraudulently misrepresented that it was a beneficiary to the loan. Plaintiff contended that Wells Fargo improperly and illegally collected payments from plaintiff alleging that Wells Fargo were not entitled to the payments. In addition, plaintiff contended that Wells Fargo violated the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act because Wells Fargo misstated the amount and legal status of the loan.
DEFENDANT'S CONTENTIONS: Defendant denied plaintiff's contentions.
Result
The court dismissed plaintiff's complaint without leave to amend because plaintiff's complaint was premised on an invalid securitization theory and incorrect interpretation of the FDCA.
For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:
Email
jeremy@reprintpros.com
for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390