This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

Real Property
Nuisance

City of Costa Mesa v. Pacific Shores Recovery, LLC, et al.

Published: Oct. 30, 2020 | Result Date: Jul. 6, 2020 | Filing Date: Sep. 25, 2019 |

Case number: 30-2019-01100581-CU-OR-NJC Summary Judgment –  Plaintiff

Judge

Craig L. Griffin

Court

Orange County Superior Court


Attorneys

Plaintiff

Ashley C. Anderson
(Everett Dorey LLP)

Christopher D. Lee
(Everett Dorey LLP)

Seymour B. Everett III
(Everett Dorey LLP)


Defendant

Steven G. Polin
(Law Office of Steven G. Polin ) for Pacific Shores Recovery

Sam B. Maralan
(Much Shelist PC) for Pacific Shores Recovery

Garrett M. Prybylo
(Much Shelist PC) for Pacific Shores Recovery

Isaac R. Zfaty
(Much Shelist PC) for Pacific Shores Recovery


Facts

Plaintiff City of Costa Mesa filed suit against defendant Pacific Shores Recovery, LLC and its operators, for continuing to operate sober living homes without the required conditional use permit, as required by the City's Municipal Code.

Contentions

PLAINTIFF'S CONTENTIONS: City of Costa Mesa asserted that defendant Pacific Shores Recovery, LLC and its operators have permitted and maintained a continuing public nuisance in the City pursuant to the California Code of Civil Procedure section 731. The City further asserted that defendants' continued maintenance of the public nuisance was in direct violation of the City of Costa Mesa's Municipal Code under CMMC sections 13-17, 20-11 and 20-12.

DEFENDANT'S CONTENTIONS: Defendants denied all allegations that they permitted and maintained a continuing public nuisance.

Result

The court granted City of Costa Mesa's motion for summary judgment. The City demonstrated that defendants owned and operated noncompliant sober living homes at the subject properties without the necessary conditional use permit required to operate under the City's Municipal Code, and that defendants are continuing to operate in direct violation of the Code. Defendants did not dispute the allegations and the court noted that defendants misapprehended their burden and failed to show that a triable issue of fact with respect to any causes of action or defenses. Because the undisputed evidence supported a nuisance per se under the City's laws, and defendants failed to show any triable issues, the court found that City of Costa Mesa was entitled to judgment in its favor.


#135965

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390