This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

Employment Law
Petition for Writ of Mandate

Kenneth Hale and Lavonne Wolf (heir to Robert Wolf, deceased) v. California Public Employees' Retirement System, and Does 1-20, inclusive

Published: Nov. 6, 2020 | Result Date: Oct. 7, 2020 | Filing Date: Sep. 12, 2018 |

Case number: CPF-18-516340 Bench Decision –  Petition Denied

Judge

Ethan P. Schulman

Court

San Francisco County Superior Court


Attorneys

Plaintiff

Gary M. Messing
(Messing, Adam & Jasmine LLP)

Jason H. Jasmine
(Messing, Adam & Jasmine LLP)

Lina B. Cockrell
(Messing, Adam & Jasmine LLP)


Respondent

John L. Shipley
(California Public Employees' Retirement System)


Facts

Petitioners Kenneth Hale and Robert Wolf were employed as firefighters by the Department of Forestry and Fire Protection (CAL FIRE). Both petitioners became members of the California Public Employees' Retirement System (CalPERS) when they began their employment with CAL FIRE. Petitioners were elected to the top two officer positions of CAL FIRE Local 2881, the exclusive bargaining representative State Bargaining Unit 8. Petitioners filed a petition for writ of mandate seeking judicial review of respondent CalPERS's denial of mandated yearly cash outs of Petitioners' holiday leave credits as pensionable special compensation.

Contentions

PETITIONER'S CONTENTIONS: Petitioner contended that the cash outs should be included in the calculation of their pension benefits because Petitioners, as union officers but still State employees (on full time union leave), could not use holiday leave because of the 24/7 demands of their positions, yet were the only two members of the bargaining unit required (under the terms of Bargaining Unit 8's memorandum of understanding) to cash out their floating holiday leave credits annually.

RESPONDENT'S CONTENTIONS: Respondent contended that petitioners were not entitled to the yearly cash outs because it did not qualify as a pensionable income under the Public Employees' Retirement Law.

Result

The court denied petitioner's writ of mandate, finding that respondent did not abuse its discretion by determining that petitioner's cash outs were not available to members of Bargaining Unit 8.


#135975

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390