This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

Consumer Law
Consumers Legal Remedies Act
Breach of Express Warranty

Kathleen Sonner, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated v. Schwabe North America Inc., Nature's Way Products LLC

Published: Nov. 13, 2020 | Result Date: Oct. 1, 2020 | Filing Date: Jul. 7, 2015 |

Case number: 5:15-cv-01358-VAP-SP Settlement –  $3,375,000

Judge

Virginia A. Phillips

Court

CD CA


Attorneys

Plaintiff

Timothy G. Blood
(Blood, Hurst & O'Reardon LLP)

Thomas J. O'Reardon II
(Blood, Hurst & O'Reardon LLP)

Paula R. Brown
(Blood, Hurst & O'Reardon LLP)

Todd D. Carpenter
(Lynch Carpenter LLP)


Defendant

Kevin W. Alexander
(Gordon & Rees LLP)

Thomas R. Watson
(Gordon & Rees LLP)

Jan Conlin
(Ciresi Conlin LLP)

Katie Crosby Lehmann
(Ciresi Conlin LLP)


Facts

Plaintiff Kathleen Sonner filed a class action lawsuit against Defendants Schwabe North America, Inc. and Nature's Way Products, LLC in relation to the advertisement of defendants' Ginkgold products.

Contentions

PLAINTIFF'S CONTENTIONS: Plaintiff contended defendants claimed that their Ginkgold products provided actual, meaningful and significant health benefits for memory, concentration, mental sharpness, and overall brain health. Plaintiff contended defendants' advertising claims, were false, misleading, and reasonably likely deceived the public. Plaintiff contended all available, reliable scientific evidence demonstrated that the Ginkgold products actually possessed no efficacy at all, was ineffective in the improvement of cognitive health, and provided no benefits related to increasing the memory, concentration, or healthy functioning of consumers' brains. Additionally, plaintiff contended it had been empirically and universally demonstrated that ginkgo biloba, an extract alleged to improve mental sharpness, did not in fact improve brain functioning, and was not effective in the treatment or improvement of memory problems or cognitive health. Plaintiff lastly contended as result of the express and implied misleading health benefits message conveyed by defendants' marketing campaign, defendants caused consumers to purchase a product that failed to function and perform as represented.

DEFENDANTS' CONTENTIONS: Defendants have and continue to vigorously deny all of plaintiff's claims related to the Ginkgold products, deny all wrongdoing, and believe the litigation was without merit. Defendants contended each and every cognitive benefit claim on the Ginkgold product labels is substantiated by "gold standard" scientific evidence, specifically, randomized, double blind, placebo-controlled trials conducted in human subjects that were published in peer-reviewed journals going back to the 1990s. Defendants contended the scientific evidence plaintiff cited in the litigation was both inconclusive and had no relation to the claims found on the Ginkgold product labels. However, to avoid the cost of litigation, its associated burden, and potential risks for both sides, the parties reached a stipulation of class action settlement.

Result

The settlement agreement established a settlement fund of $3,375,000, and settlement class nembers could receive $18.00 or $33.00 for each unit of Ginkgold or Ginkgold Max purchased, based on the product variation.


#136028

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390