This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

Consumer Law
Consumer Protection
Unfair Competition

The People of the State of California v. Santander Consumer USA Inc.

Published: Nov. 20, 2020 | Result Date: May 19, 2020 | Filing Date: May 19, 2020 |

Case number: 20-CIV-02157 Settlement –  $550,000,000

Judge

Jonathan E. Karesh

Court

San Mateo County Superior Court


Attorneys

Plaintiff

Hunter H. Landerholm
(Office of the Attorney General)


Defendant

David B. Anders
(Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen & Katz)


Facts

Defendant Santander Consumer USA, Inc. has consistently accounted for the largest share of the subprime auto lending market. Defendant primarily makes direct loans to consumers and purchases installment contracts from dealers. The People of the State of California filed lawsuit against defendant Santander Consumer, USA Inc. for violations of the Unfair Competition Law, Business & Professions Code Section 17200.

Contentions

PLAINTIFF'S CONTENTIONS: Plaintiff contended that defendant violated consumer protection laws by intentionally placing borrowers with subprime credit into auto loans which defendant knew had a high probability of default. In addition, plaintiff contended that defendant failed to monitor auto dealership behavior in order to minimize the risk of receiving false information in relation to the auto loans, including consumers' income and expenses.

DEFENDANT'S CONTENTIONS: Defendant denied plaintiff's contentions.

Result

The parties settled the case for over $550 million, which consisted of a $70 million payment to consumers defendant approved for its loans. The rest of the settlement amount was composed of waivers of customer deficiency balances and in-kind relief. In addition, as injunctive relief, defendant agreed to comply with the UCL. Specifically, defendant must review a Consumer's Residual Income prior to purchasing an auto loan.


#136049

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390