This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

Consumer Law
Fair Credit Reporting Act
California Investigative Consumer Reporting Agencies Act

Luis Arroyo, on behalf of himself, all others similarly situated v. J.R. Simplot Company, and Does 1 through 50, inclusive

Published: Dec. 4, 2020 | Result Date: Nov. 4, 2020 | Filing Date: Oct. 4, 2018 |

Case number: 18CV335800 Settlement –  $950,000

Judge

Patricia M. Lucas

Court

Santa Clara County Superior Court


Attorneys

Plaintiff

C. Shaun Setareh
(Setareh Law Group )

Thomas A. Segal
(Setareh Law Group)

Farrah B. Grant
(Setareh Law Group)


Defendant

Michael J. Nader
(Ogletree, Deakins, Nash, Smoak & Stewart PC)


Facts

Plaintiff Luis Arroyo filed a class action lawsuit against defendant J.R. Simplot Company for wage and hour violations and violations of the Fair Credit Reporting Act, the California Investigative Consumer Reporting Agencies Act and the California Consumer Credit Reporting Agencies Act.

Contentions

PLAINTIFF'S CONTENTIONS: Plaintiff contended that defendant acquired consumer credit reports in order to conduct background checks on plaintiff and other current and former employees of defendant. Plaintiff contended that the information defendant obtained from the consumer credit reports was used by defendant with their hiring process. However, defendant failed to obtain proper authorization from plaintiffs. Moreover, plaintiff contended that defendant violated the Labor Code and Business and Professions Code by failing to provide plaintiffs their required meal breaks and rest breaks; failing to compensate plaintiffs for wages owed from the missed meal breaks and rest breaks; failing to compensate plaintiffs for minimum wage and overtime wages and for failing to provide plaintiffs accurate itemized wage statements.

DEFENDANT'S CONTENTIONS: Defendant denied the contentions.

Result

The parties agreed to settle the case for $950,000. Out of the settlement amount, $316,666.66 will be awarded as attorney's fees, $25,000 will be awarded as costs, $5,000 will be awarded as service award and $43,000 will be awarded as settlement administration costs.


#136124

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390