This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

Securities
Securities Fraud

Securities and Exchange Commission v. Curative Biosciences Inc. fka Healthient Inc., William M. Alverson, Katherine West Alverson, Steven G. Patton

Published: Dec. 31, 2020 | Result Date: Oct. 26, 2020 |

Case number: 8:18-cv-00925-SVW-E Verdict –  $2,127,851

Judge

Stephen V. Wilson

Court

CD CA


Attorneys

Plaintiff

Dennis R. Farney
(U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission)

Melissa J. Armstrong
(U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission)

Gary Y. Leung
(Securities and Exchange Commission)

Gina M. Joyce
(U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission)


Defendant

Jeffrey S. Benice
(Law Offices of Jeffrey S. Benice)


Facts

The Securities and Exchange Commission filed suit against Defendants Curative Biosciences, Inc., also known as Healthient, Inc., William M. Alverson, the Chairman of the Board, and Katherine West Alverson, the President and Chief Executive Officer, for violations of the Securities Act of 1933 and the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

Contentions

PLAINTIFF'S CONTENTIONS: Plaintiff contended Defendants made materially false and misleading statements to the investing public in the Company's 2013 Forms 10-K and 10-K/A, for the purpose of concealing their unregistered sales of more than 33 million shares of the Company's stock, which resulted in majority of the proceeds being paid to themselves. Plaintiff contended Alverson and West devised a plan to divert millions of shares of stock to business acquaintance Steven G. Patton, which would be disguised in the Company's public filings as payment for consulting services, when Patton never performed such services. Plaintiff contended that pursuant to the plan, Alverson directed Patton to sell all of the shares the company issued to him, keep a small payment for himself, and divert the bulk of the proceeds back to Alverson and two entities also controlled by Alverson. Overall, Plaintiff contended the Alversons used nearly $4 million in diverted proceeds for personal expenses that included country club fees, spa fees, retail purchases, restaurant tabs, personal use and other unrelated business expenditures.

DEFENDANTS' CONTENTIONS: Defendants denied Plaintiff's contentions.

Result

The jury found in favor of the SEC. The Alversons were ordered to pay $847,851 in disgorgement and each one of them was required to pay $640,000 as a civil penalty. Additionally, the court imposed permanent officer-and-director and penny stock bars against the Alversons, as well as conduct-based injunctions that barred them from participating in the issuance, offer, or sale of any security except securities sold on a national exchange for their own accounts.


#136150

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390