This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

Consumer Law
Consumer Protection
Telemarketing and Consumer Fraud and Abuse Prevention Act

Federal Trade Commission v. American Financial Benefits Center also dba AFB and AF Student Services; Ameritech Financial; Financial Education Benefits Center; Brandon Demond Frere, individually and as an officer of American Financial Benefits Center, Ameritech Financial and Financial Education Benefits Center

Published: Dec. 11, 2020 | Result Date: Nov. 19, 2020 |

Case number: 4:18-cv-00806-SBA Settlement –  $62,000,000

Judge

Saundra B. Armstrong

Court

USDC Northern District of California


Attorneys

Plaintiff

Evan P. Rose
(Federal Trade Commission)

Roberta D. Tonelli
(Federal Trade Commission)

Sarah E. Schroeder
(Federal Trade Commission)


Defendant

Patrick J. Richard
(Nossaman LLP)

James H. Vorhis
(Nossaman LLP)

Jill N. Jaffe
(Nossaman LLP)

Todd A. Roberts
(Ropers Majeski PC)

Nicole S. Healy


Facts

The Federal Trade Commission filed suit and sought a permanent injunction against defendants Brandon Frere and his companies, American Financial Benefits Center, also doing business as AFB and AF Student Services, Ameritech Financial, and Financial Education Benefits Center, for alleged violations of the Federal Trade Commission Act, 15 U.S.C. Section 53(b), the Telemarketing and Consumer Fraud and Abuse Prevention Act, 15 U.S.C. Section 6101-6108, and the Telemarketing Sales Rule, 16 C.F.R. Section 310.

Contentions

PLAINTIFF'S CONTENTIONS: Plaintiff contended defendant and his companies misled nearly 40,000 consumers with information about lowering their student loan debts. Specifically, plaintiff contended defendant Brandon Frere and his companies sent personalized mail to consumers that falsely claimed they were entitled or eligible for federal programs that permanently reduced their monthly debt payments or entitled to total loan forgiveness. Plaintiff further contended defendant and his companies then charged up to $800 in illegal up-front fees for the purpose of enrolling consumers in federal loan assistance programs. Plaintiff additionally contended defendants also charged consumers $100-$1,300 advance fees for enrollment in a purported financial education program, followed by $49-$99 monthly membership fees for the life of the loan, typically 10-25 years.

DEFENDANTS CONTENTIONS: Defendants denied plaintiff's contentions.

Result

The case settled for $62,000,000, all but approximately $9 million of which was suspended. The court granted plaintiff's permanent injunction and banned defendant and his companies from providing debt relief services and further prohibited defendants from violating the Telemarketing Sales Rule.


#136223

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390