This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

Government
Social Security Administration
Disability Benefits

Todd A. Whynaught v. Carolyn W. Colvin

Published: Jan. 8, 2021 | Result Date: Nov. 19, 2020 | Filing Date: Jun. 21, 2016 |

Case number: 16-cv-01574 JAH-NLS Summary Judgment –  Defense

Judge

John A. Houston

Court

USDC Southern District of California


Attorneys

Plaintiff

Brian C. Shapiro
(Law Offices of Lawrence D. Rohlfing)


Defendant

Marcelo N. Illarmo
(Social Security Administration)

Katherine L. Parker
(Office of the U.S. Attorney)

Thomas C. Stahl
(Office of the U.S. Attorney)


Facts

Plaintiff Todd A. Whynaught sought review of the Commissioner of Social Security's decision denying plaintiff's application for disability insurance benefits. Plaintiff alleged Defendant violated Title XVI of the Social Security Act.

Contentions

PLAINTIFF'S CONTENTIONS: Plaintiff first contended Defendant erred when it concluded Plaintiff was not disabled because the ALJ had previously determined Plaintiff suffered from severe impairments that included spinal stenosis of the lumbar region with radiculopathy, otherwise known as left leg pain, a disorder of the left hand, status post-surgery to the left thumb, and a history of right ankle fracture and status post right ankle surgery. Plaintiff further contended the ALJ erred when it gave little weight to the opinion of his treating physician, some weight to the opinion of his consulting physician, and significant weight to the opinion of the State agency medical consultant. Plaintiff contended his treating physician limited him to sitting to twenty minutes at a time, and stated that he required the ability to shift positions every thirty minutes, but Defendant did not give much consideration to that medical opinion.

DEFENDANT'S CONTENTIONS: Defendant denied Plaintiff's contentions, and contended Plaintiff did not have an impairment or combination of impairments that amounted to medical severity. Additionally Defendant contended the record showed that Plaintiff had already received treatment, which included numerous epidural steroid injections, prescriptions of Vicodin and Morphine, and was evaluated for surgical intervention due to his pain.

Result

The court granted Defendant's motion for summary judgment.


#136255

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390