Luis Marquez v. Ralphs Grocery Company, and Does 1-10
Published: Jan. 15, 2021 | Result Date: Dec. 4, 2020 | Filing Date: Jun. 27, 2019 |Case number: 8:19-cv-01300-JLS-DFM Summary Judgment – Defense
Judge
Court
CD CA
Attorneys
Plaintiff
Russell C. Handy
(Center for Disability Access)
Raymond G. Ballister Jr.
(Center for Disability Access)
Phyl Grace
(Center for Disability Access)
Dennis J. Price II
(Center for Disability Access)
Defendant
Gregory F. Hurley
(Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP)
Michael J. Chilleen
(Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP)
Facts
Luis Marquez had certain physical disabilities that caused him to be wheelchair bound. Marquez visited the meat department in a Food 4 Less store in Fullerton, California owned by Ralphs Grocery Company. After Marquez's visit, he sued Ralphs under the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990. Ralphs later moved for summary judgment against Marquez.
Contentions
PLAINTIFF'S CONTENTIONS: Plaintiff contended that defendant failed to provide self-service areas that were accessible to people with physical disabilities. Plaintiff was restricted from selecting a number at the meat counter because of defendant's failure to construct the area for wheelchair accessibility as required by the ADA. Moreover, plaintiff was unable to reach the restroom facilities due to structural barriers. As a result, plaintiff contended that defendant was liable under the ADA and Unruh Civil Rights Act for failing to maintain its property in a way that was accessible to people with disabilities.
DEFENDANT'S CONTENTIONS: Defendant contended that the ADA does not apply to shelves or display units in a venue open to the public. Moreover, self-services areas were not within the purview of the ADA. Defendant further contended that because plaintiff failed to allege his restroom accessibility claim in his complaint and only did so after defendant's answer, the claim could not be asserted. Defendant ultimately contended that because there were no legally cognizable claims in plaintiff's complaint, defendant's motion for summary judgment should be granted as a matter of law.
Result
The court granted defendant's motion for summary judgment.
For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:
Email
jeremy@reprintpros.com
for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390