This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

Government
Social Security Administration
Disability Insurance Benefits

Nicholas Zavala Cisneros v. Andrew Saul

Published: Feb. 26, 2021 | Result Date: Jan. 22, 2021 | Filing Date: Sep. 18, 2019 |

Case number: 1:19-cv-01307-GSA Bench Decision –  Plaintiff

Judge

Gary S. Austin

Court

USDC Eastern District of California


Attorneys

Plaintiff

Jonathan O. Pena-Mancinas
(Pena & Bromberg PC)


Defendant

Carol S. Clark
(Social Security Administration)

Benjamin E. Hall
(Office of the U.S. Attorney)


Facts

Plaintiff Nicholas Zavala Cisneros sought review of the Defendant Commissioner of Social Security, after Defendant denied Plaintiff's application for disability insurance benefits and supplemental security income. Plaintiff previously worked as a prep cook at a casino for 15 years when he injured his lower back lifting a tray of chicken. Defendant applied for disability insurance benefits and supplemental security income but was denied.

Contentions

PLAINTIFF'S CONTENTIONS: Plaintiff contended Defendant erred when it discounted the diagnosis of Dr. Nijjar, who diagnosed Plaintiff with a sprain/strain of the lumbar spine, without identifying any specific legitimate reasons. Specifically, Plaintiff contended Defendant erred when it discounted Dr. Nijjar's opinion that Plaintiff could lift no more than 30 pounds with no repetitive twisting of the body because that opinion was a Workers Compensation evaluation, that ultimately relied on different standards from the Social Security disability standards.

DEFENDANT'S CONTENTIONS: Defendant denied Plaintiff's contentions, and moved for summary judgment.

Result

The court entered judgment in favor of Plaintiff and against Defendant Commissioner of Social Security, after it concluded the ALJ improperly discounted Dr. Nijjar's opinion with insufficient reasoning because it depended on different standards than Social Security.


#136641

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390