This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

Contracts
Breach of Contract
Breach of Covenant of Good Faith and Fair Dealing

John's Grill Inc., John Konstin v. The Hartford Financial Services Group Inc., Sentinel Insurance Company Ltd., Norbay Insurance Services Inc., and Does 1 through 10, inclusive

Published: Mar. 12, 2021 | Result Date: Feb. 10, 2021 | Filing Date: Apr. 15, 2020 |

Case number: CGC-20-584184 Bench Decision –  Defense

Judge

Ethan P. Schulman

Court

San Francisco County Superior Court


Attorneys

Plaintiff

Nanci E. Nishimura
(Cotchett, Pitre & McCarthy LLP)

Brian Danitz
(Cotchett, Pitre & McCarthy LLP)

Andrew F. Kirtley
(Cotchett, Pitre & McCarthy, LLP)


Defendant

Anthony J. Anscombe
(Steptoe LLP)

Johanna Oh
(Steptoe & Johnson LLP)

Sarah D. Gordon
(Steptoe & Johnson LLP)


Facts

Due to the spread of the novel virus COVID-19, the state of California and the city of San Francisco local authorities issued a stay-at-home order requiring restaurants to close for business. Plaintiff, John's Grill, Inc., a restaurant located in downtown San Francisco was forced to close its doors to the public due to the stay-at-home order. As result, plaintiff suffered severe financial losses as it was forced to lay off 54 of its workers. Plaintiff obtained Spectrum Business Owner's Policy No. 57 from defendants the Hartford Financial Services, Group, Inc., Sentinel Insurance Company, Ltd., and Norbay Insurance Services, Inc. On March 2020, plaintiff requested coverage from defendants under the said policy. Defendants denied plaintiff's request. Plaintiff filed a lawsuit against defendants in relation to defendant's denial of plaintiff's insurance claims.

Contentions

PLAINTIFF'S CONTENTIONS: Plaintiff contended that defendant breached its contract because defendant had a contractual duty to provide plaintiff with insurance coverage under the policy. Plaintiff contended that defendant breached the covenant of good faith and fair dealing by denying plaintiff insurance coverage to which plaintiff was entitled. Plaintiff further contended that defendant's denial of plaintiff's insurance claim was made in bad faith.

DEFENDANT'S CONTENTIONS: Defendant denied plaintiff's contentions. Defendant contended that plaintiff's complaint failed to state facts sufficient to plead a valid cause of action.

Result

The court sustained defendant's demurrer to plaintiff's first amended complaint without leave to amend ruling that none of plaintiff's claims stated a cause of action.


#136703

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390