This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

Torts
Negligence
Unfair and Deceptive Trade Practices Act

In re: Citrix Data Breach Litigation

Published: Mar. 12, 2021 | Result Date: Jan. 26, 2021 | Filing Date: Jul. 29, 2019 |

Case number: USDC Florida: 0:19-cv-61350-RKA Settlement –  $2,275,000

Attorneys

Plaintiff

John A. Yanchunis
(Morgan & Morgan Complex Litigation Group)

Patrick A. Barthle III
(Morgan & Morgan Complex Litigation Group)

Norman E. Siegel
(Stueve, Siegel & Hanson LLP)

J. Austin Moore
(Stueve, Siegel & Hanson LLP)

Gayle M. Blatt
(Casey, Gerry, Schenk, Francavilla, Blatt & Penfield LLP)

David S. Casey Jr.
(Casey, Gerry, Schenk, Francavilla, Blatt & Penfield LLP)

Herman J. Russomanno
(Russomanno & Borrello PA)

Robert J. Borrello
(Russomanno & Borrello PA)

Herman J. Russomanno III
(Russomano & Borrello PA)

Rosemary M. Rivas
(Gibbs Law Group LLP)


Defendant

David F. McDowell Jr.
(Morrison & Foerster LLP)

Nancy R. Thomas
(Davis, Wright & Tremaine LLP)


Facts

Citrix Systems, Inc. is a global technology company that provides cloud computing software and remote access products. Citrix's network was hacked and the hackers were able to access Citrix's internal network and exfiltrated information pertaining to 24,316 current and former employees, their dependents or beneficiaries, or other third parties. Citrix informed its consumers, who then initiated three class action complaints against Citrix that were eventually consolidated.

Contentions

PLAINTIFFS' CONTENTIONS: Plaintiffs contended that defendant was liable for breach of contract. Defendant collected plaintiffs' identifying information, including social security numbers, names, and birthdays, as a condition of employment and patronage. As a condition of collecting that data, defendants were obligated to implement safeguards that were appropriate under applicable industry standards to protect plaintiffs' information. As a result of Citrix's failure to protect the information with which it was entrusted to safeguard, Plaintiffs suffered harm and were exposed to a significant risk of identity theft, financial fraud, and other identity-related fraud for years to come.

DEFENDANT'S CONTENTIONS: Defendants denied the contentions and contended that they implemented appropriate safeguards.

Result

The parties entered a $2,275,000 settlement agreement.

Other Information

JUDGE: Hon. Roy K. Altman.


#136724

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390