Eric Neal Johnson v. Andrew M. Saul
Published: Mar. 19, 2021 | Result Date: Feb. 25, 2021 | Filing Date: Nov. 20, 2019 |Case number: 1:19-cv-1647 JLT Summary Judgment – Plaintiff
Judge
Court
USDC Eastern District of California
Attorneys
Petitioner
Jonathan O. Pena-Mancinas
(Pena & Bromberg PC)
Respondent
Benjamin E. Hall
(Office of the U.S. Attorney)
Michael K. Marriott
(Social Security Administration)
Facts
Plaintiff Eric Neal Johnson sought judicial review of the Commissioner of Social Security's decision denying Plaintiff's application for disability insurance benefits.
Contentions
PLAINTIFF'S CONTENTIONS: Plaintiff contended he became disabled in 2015, due to deep vascular thrombosis in his right leg, advanced degenerative joint disease in his left knee, hypercoagulable state of Lupus anticoagulant, hypertension, dizziness, and weakness. Additionally, Plaintiff contended that he had experienced knee issues since 1985, when he was in a car accident that required surgery on his left knee. Plaintiff further contended that he reported he felt physically weaker from taking blood thinners and was unable to stand for long periods of time. Thus, Plaintiff contended Defendant failed to properly consider Plaintiff's subjective statements.
DEFENDANT'S CONTENTIONS: Defendant denied Plaintiff's contentions, and contended Plaintiff's rejected disability application was based on substantial evidence such as there was no durational medical explanation or findings that supported Plaintiff's alleged limitations.
Result
The court ruled in Plaintiff's favor after it determined Defendant erred when it evaluated Plaintiff's medical record and subjective complaints.
For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:
Email
jeremy@reprintpros.com
for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390