This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

Government
Social Security Administration
Disability Insurance Benefits

Danielle Marie Solano v. Andrew M. Saul

Published: Apr. 2, 2021 | Result Date: Mar. 1, 2021 | Filing Date: Sep. 25, 2019 |

Case number: 1:19-cv-1351 JLT Bench Decision –  Plaintiff

Judge

Jennifer L. Thurston

Court

USDC Eastern District of California


Attorneys

Petitioner

Jonathan O. Pena-Mancinas
(Pena & Bromberg PC)


Respondent

Benjamin E. Hall
(Office of the U.S. Attorney)

Carolyn B. Chen
(Social Security Administration)


Facts

Danielle Marie Solano filed for Social Security Disability benefits from the Commissioner of Social Security after being medically diagnosed with bipolar personality disorder, a degenerative disc disease, migraines, and high blood pressure. However, her application for benefits was denied.

Contentions

PLAINTIFF'S CONTENTIONS: Plaintiff contended that the administrative law judge improperly dismissed the evidence plaintiff presented from her medical expert. Plaintiff contended that the ALJ did not have legally sufficient reasons to require more information to prove plaintiff's disability. Lastly, the ALJ's evaluation process resulted in an opinion that was inconsistent with all the evidence presented in the process.

DEFENDANT'S CONTENTIONS: Defendant contended that the denial was legally sound. The ALJ not only gave proper weight to the evidence that was properly admitted, but the ALJ also made the most sound decision based on the evidence presented.

Result

The court concluded that the ALJ failed to show legally sufficient reasons for rejecting plaintiff's evidence. The case was remanded for further proceedings on the existence and extent of plaintiff's disability.


#136840

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390