This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

Personal Injury
Premises Liability
Negligent Infliction of Emotional Distress

Isaac Lambert; Anthony Lambert v. Doe Property Management Company, Doe Homeowners Association, Doe Pool Maintenance Company

Published: Apr. 16, 2021 | Result Date: Jan. 8, 2021 |

Settlement –  $11,000,000

Judge

Charles Margines

Court

Orange County Superior Court


Attorneys

Plaintiff

Casey R. Johnson
(Aitken Aitken Cohn)

Richard A. Cohn
(Aitken Aitken Cohn)


Defendant


Experts

Plaintiff

Alison Osinski Ph.D.
(aquatic safety)

Rick English
(pool design)

Joellen Gill
(human factors)

Melodie Metzger
(biomechanical engineering)

Doreen Casuto RN, MRA, CRRN, CCM
(life care planning)

Catherine M. Graves MBA
(economics)

Amy L. Magnusson M.D.
(physical medicine and rehabilitation)

Facts

On Aug. 26, 2019, at 1:30 p.m., Isaac Lambert, a 20-year-old student, joined his family for a barbeque and swimming at the pool within the HOA where his father had recently begun renting a condominium. The rest of the family, including Isaac's father, uncles, grandparents and cousins were already within the pool area when he decided to join them by walking from his father's unit into the pool area through the "back" gate.

Isaac entered the pool area and walked across the decking to tables and chairs where his family, including his grandparents, were sitting. He greeted everyone in the pool area and spent ten to fifteen minutes speaking primarily with his grandparents, who were visiting from out of town, when he decided to get into the pool.

Isaac walked over to what he believed was the deep end, the part of the pool furthest from the gate where he had entered the pool area. At all times while in the pool area, there were no "no diving" signs visible to him, (but rather only the numerous "no smoking signs" around the barbeque and tables in the pool area.) Isaac also saw his niece on the other side of the pool, and his uncle, who was closer to Isaac, and visible from the neck/shoulders up - confirming in Isaac's mind that his uncle was in the deep end of the pool.

Isaac thought that he was safely diving into the deep end of the pool; but in fact, there was no deep end, nor shallow end. However, Isaac was actually diving toward the shallow side of the pool (and into the "embankment" that unexpectedly ran lengthwise in the middle of the pool abruptly separating the deep side of the pool from the shallow side.) He impacted the embankment and was immediately paralyzed.

Contentions

PLAINTIFF'S CONTENTIONS: Plaintiff claimed that the homeowners association pool was dangerous for a number of reasons.

First, there was no conspicuous "No Diving" signage as required by law. The cardboard sign that was present in the pool area was faded and unreadable. Furthermore, the pool warnings sign
was installed on fencing so as to be behind any pool users who entered from the "back" gate, as Isaac did on the date of the incident.

Second, the pool was dangerously designed such that it had a deep side, rather than a deep end. This unusual, if not unheard of, configuration makes the need for reasonable and visible warnings all the more essential.

Third, there were no "No Diving" tiles set into the pool deck to alert pool users that diving was prohibited.

Fourth, the in-pool, wall-mounted depth markers were installed at the water line of the pool and maintained such that they were transected, and in fact almost completely obscured by the water line, thus rendering them unreadable to pool users.

Fifth, the pool was dangerously designed to have two entrances, and all visual cues provide to those entering the pool from the rear entrance reinforced that the rear entrance was nearest the shallow end of the pool.

Sixth, the written and posted "Pool Rules" did not provide pool users with any indication that diving was prohibited in the pool.

Plaintiffs alleged that Doe Homeowners' Association breached its non-delegable duty as the owner of the pool to maintain the pool in a reasonably safe condition. Plaintiffs alleged that Defendants Doe Property Management Company and Doe Pool Maintenance Company, who were both contracted by Doe Homeowners' Association, failed to maintain the pool in a reasonably safe condition.

DEFENDANT'S CONTENTIONS: Defendants claimed that they were protected from liability based on the doctrine of assumption of the risk, insofar as Isaac Lambert assumed the risk of being injured while participating the sport of diving/swimming. Defendants further argued that Isaac assumed the risk of injury by diving into a pool without knowing its depth. Defendants nevertheless tendered the full policy limits of all applicable policies in response to Plaintiffs' time-limited policy limit demand.

Specials in Evidence

Meds: $275,000 Loe: Plaintiff claimed asserted loss of future earnings/earning capacity of $2 million. Future Meds: $20 million.

Injuries

Isaac suffered spinal cord fractures from C3 through C6 and was determined to have a complete spinal cord injury at C5 with an ASIA Impairment Scale Class A -resulting in quadriplegia/tetraplegia. Anthony Lambert, Isaac's father, witnessed the injury and therefore maintained a claim for negligent infliction of emotional distress.

Result

The case settled for $11 million.


#136948

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390