Mary R. v. Andrew M. Saul
Published: May 7, 2021 | Result Date: Mar. 30, 2021 | Filing Date: Dec. 17, 2019 |Case number: ED CV 19-2431-SP Summary Judgment – Defense
Judge
Court
CD CA
Attorneys
Plaintiff
Cyrus Safa
(Law Offices of Lawrence D. Rohlfing)
Defendant
Marla K. Letellier
(Social Security Administration)
Facts
Plaintiff Mary R. sought judicial review of a final decision by Administrative Law Judge who denied Plaintiff's application for Disability and Supplemental Social Security Income. Plaintiff previously applied for benefits due to bilateral carpal tunnel in both hands, hyperthyroidism, high blood pressure, and depression, but the ALJ determined Plaintiff was not disabled. Plaintiff then asserted causes of action for violations of Title XVI of the Social Security Act and challenged the ALJ's decision.
Contentions
PLAINTIFF'S CONTENTIONS: Plaintiff contended Defendant ALJ erred when it improperly discounted the opinion of a state agency physician. Plaintiff further contended the ALJ improperly determined that plaintiff did not suffer from a severe mental impairment at step two. Specifically, Plaintiff contended at step two, the ALJ improperly determined that plaintiff's medical determinable mental impairment of depression was not severe.
DEFENDANT'S CONTENTIONS: Defendant denied Plaintiff's contentions and moved for summary judgment on the basis that Plaintiff's medical determinable mental impairment of depression was not severe, since it did not cause more than minimal limitations in plaintiff's ability to perform basic mental work activities. Thus Defendant contended Plaintiff was not disabled.
Result
The court ruled in favor of Defendant and affirmed the ALJ's decision after it concluded the ALJ properly discounted the opinion of the state agency physician and properly determined that plaintiff did not suffer from a severe mental impairment.
For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:
Email
jeremy@reprintpros.com
for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390