This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

Civil Rights
Excessive Force
Wrongful Death

Isiah Murrietta-Golding, deceased through his successor in interest Christina Lopez, et al. v. City of Fresno, City of Fresno Police Chief Jerry Dyer, Fresno Police Sgt. Ray Villalvazo, and Does 1-10

Published: May 14, 2021 | Result Date: Apr. 26, 2021 | Filing Date: Mar. 6, 2018 |

Case number: 1:18-cv-00314 AWI SKO Settlement –  $4,900,000

Judge

Anthony W. Ishii

Court

USDC Eastern District of California


Attorneys

Plaintiff

Michael J. Haddad
(Haddad & Sherwin LLP)

Julia Sherwin
(Haddad & Sherwin LLP)

Teresa D. Allen
(Haddad & Sherwin LLP)


Defendant

Scott W. Davenport
(Manning & Kass, Ellrod, Ramirez, Trester LLP)

Lynn L. Carpenter
(Manning & Kass Ellrod Ramirez Trester LLP)

Mildred K. O'Linn
(Manning & Kass, Ellrod, Ramirez, Trester LLP)

Anthony M. Sain
(Lewis, Brisbois, Bisgaard & Smith LLP)


Facts

In 2017, 16-year-old Isiah Murrietta-Golding and his brother were considered suspects in a deadly shooting. Police attempted to detain Isiah in a shopping center parking lot. While running away from the police, Isiah jumped over a fence and took approximately eight steps before he was shot in the back of the head by a police officer. Isiah had reached to pull up his pants but was unarmed. Isiah's parents brought claims against the City of Fresno, City of Fresno Policy Chief, and Fresno police Sergeant Ray Villalvazo alleging claims under 42 U.S.C. Section 1983 for violations of the First, Fourth, and Fourteenth Amendments, and state law claims.

Contentions

PLAINTIFFS' CONTENTIONS: Plaintiffs contended defendant Villalvazo violated Isiah's constitutional rights by using deadly force. Plaintiffs also contended lethal force was not justified because Isiah was attempting to run away
and was unarmed. Simply pulling up his pants did not pose an immediate threat to justify deadly force. Plaintiffs also
contended defendants violated state law when the police officer shot Isiah in the back of the head.

DEFENDANTS' CONTENTIONS: Defendants contended that the shooting was justified because Isiah, a murder suspect, appeared to be reaching for a weapon and the officer reasonably believed his life was in danger. Defendants also asserted that the officer was entitled to qualified immunity.

Result

This case settled for $4,900,000.


#137079

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390