This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

Employment Law
Wage and Hour
Waiting Time Penalties

Isaac Rodriguez, as an individual and on behalf of all others similarly situated v. Nike Retail Services Inc., and Does 1 through 50, inclusive

Published: Jun. 4, 2021 | Result Date: Apr. 23, 2021 | Filing Date: Apr. 1, 2014 |

Case number: 5:14-cv-01508-BLF Settlement –  $8,250,000

Judge

Beth L. Freeman

Court

USDC Northern District of California


Attorneys

Plaintiff

Larry W. Lee
(Diversity Law Group PC)

Kristen M. Agnew
(Diversity Law Group PC)

Nicholas Rosenthal
(The Kick Law Firm)

Max W. Gavron
(Diversity Law Group PC)

Kwanporn Tulyathan
(Diversity Law Group PC)

William L. Marder
(Polaris Law Group LLP)

Dennis S. Hyun
(Hyun Legal APC)


Defendant

Joshua David Kienitz
(Littler Mendelson PC)

Melanie M.C. Cole
(Seyfarth Shaw LLP)

Robert G. Hulteng
(Littler Mendelson PC)


Facts

Issac Rodriguez was employed by Nike Retail Services, Inc. as a non-exempt employee at its retail outlet store in Gilroy, CA. He was instructed and required to undergo an off-the-clock security check or visual bag inspection before exiting the Nike store at any time. Rodriguez brought an action against Nike, alleging that Nike did not pay Rodriguez and all other non-exempt employees' applicable minimum and overtime wages in connection to the time spent waiting for security checks and visual inspections.

Contentions

PLAINTIFFS' CONTENTIONS: Plaintiffs contended that defendants violated California labor law when defendants failed to pay its employees in connection to the time spent waiting for security checks and visual inspections. Plaintiffs contended that the "de minimis" rule does not apply because these were not trivial or short burdens and fell within their work duties and it did not apply under the California wage codes.

DEFENDANTS' CONTENTIONS: Defendants denied all of the contentions. Defendants contended that its conduct complied with California law. Defendants contended that wait times for security checks were exempt from compensation under the "de minimis" rule which exempts employers from having to pay workers for short or trivial burdens that fall outside of work duties.

Result

The case settled for $8,250,000. Nike will establish a $5.1 million fund to be split among a class of over 16,000 hourly retail employees who worked between February 2010 and November 2019. Nike also agreed to amend its policies to have security checks as on-the-clock work. Nike will also set aside $3 million in class counsel fees and costs.


#137176

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390