Jonely Alce v. AMRI Transportation, Inc.
Published: Jun. 25, 2021 | Result Date: Jun. 4, 2021 |Case number: BCV-17-100332 Verdict – $1,094,494
Judge
Court
Kern County Superior Court
Attorneys
Plaintiff
H. Gavin Long
(Bisnar Chase)
Defendant
Robert T. Bergsten
(Hosp, Gilbert & Bergsten)
Experts
Plaintiff
Devin Binder M.D.
(Plaintiff Neurosurgeon )
Mary Eng
(physiotherapist)
Jorge Saenz M.D.
(Pain Management)
Defendant
Stephen L.G. Rothman M.D.
(Radiologist )
Gerald Alexander M.D.
(orthopedic surgery)
Facts
Plaintiff Jonely Alce, 22 years old, was traveling as a passenger in a Mazda four-door sedan from Velasco Texas to San Antonio Texas to attend a religious service.
As Alce's vehicle was traveling straight on the highway, a semi tractor trailer entered her lane, striking her vehicle three times sending it off the road on to a grass field.
Contentions
PLAINTIFF'S CONTENTIONS: Alce developed neck and back pain, received physical therapy, chiropractic care, pain management and ultimately a surgical recommendation to her lumbar spine. Alce did not have the surgery scheduled at the time of trial.
The subject collision caused Alce to suffer a 3 mm L4/5 lumbar protrusion that impinged the exiting nerve root and thecal sac resulting in conservative care, pain management and a surgical recommendation.
DEFENDANT'S CONTEIONTS; The collision was a sideswipe, which does not cause lumbar protrusions.
No protrusions were seen on the MRIs per defense experts.
Alce only suffered strains and sprains which caused 6 to 8 weeks of neck and back pain.
Alce had a fall in high school where she had x-rays to her neck and back which were not available to see if she had any spinal problems that pre-dated the subject collision.
Alce also suffered three subsequent injury causing events which caused her prolonged treatment.
Alce was able to work extensively during the first year and a half after the collision so she was not injured as badly as she was claiming.
Alce's treatment was provided on a lien basis which encouraged the providers to provide unnecessary treatment per defense experts.
Settlement Discussions
Plaintiff made a CCP 998 demand of $205,000; Defense made CCP 998 offer of $125,000.
Specials in Evidence
Meds: $122,794 Future Meds: $235,700
Damages
Past and Future Medical Expenses; Past and Future General Damages
Injuries
Alce suffered 3 mm L4/5 lumbar protrusion that impinged the exiting nerve root and thecal sac. Alce developed neck and back pain, received physical therapy, chiropractic care, pain management and ultimately a surgical recommendation to her lumbar spine. Alce did not have the surgery scheduled at the time of trial.
Result
Jury verdict of $1,094,494
Other Information
Plaintiff is seeking $230,000 in interest and $90,000 in costs.
Deliberation
four hours
Poll
10-2
Length
seven days
For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:
Email
jeremy@reprintpros.com
for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390