This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

Civil Rights
ADA
Unruh Civil Rights Act

Orlando Garcia v. Sweet 2017 LLC

Published: Jul. 16, 2021 | Result Date: Jun. 11, 2021 | Filing Date: Oct. 30, 2020 |

Case number: 2:20-cv-02181-JAM-DB Bench Decision –  Defense

Judge

John A. Mendez

Court

USDC Eastern District of California


Attorneys

Plaintiff

Zachary M. Best
(Center for Disability Access)

Russell C. Handy
(Center for Disability Access)

Dennis J. Price II
(Center for Disability Access)

Amanda L. Seabock
(Center for Disability Access)


Defendant

Ashley Nicole Arnett
(Seyfarth Shaw LLP)

Minh N. Vu
(Seyfarth Shaw LLP)


Facts

Orlando Garcia suffers from cerebral palsy, which substantially limits his ability to walk. He uses a wheel chair, walker, or cane for mobility. Garcia planned to make a trip to the Sacramento area and chose the Wyndham Garden Hotel owned by defendant Sweet 2017, LLC. Defendant provided no details as to whether the hotel guestrooms provided accessibility for those who are disabled. Garcia needed to know that there is at least 30 inches width on the side of the bed. He also needed to know the doorways had 32 inches of clear width. Garcia similarly needed to know whether the toilet has two grab bars and the height of the toilet, among other things. As such, Garcia alleged that defendant was in violation of the Americans with Disabilities Act and Unruh Civil Rights Act.

Contentions

PLAINTIFF'S CONTENTIONS: Plaintiff contended Defendant's reservation system violated the "reservation rule" because defendant's website did not provide sufficient detail about the Hotel's accessible features to allow him to make an independent assessment of whether the rooms would meet his needs. Plaintiff contended defendant violated California's Unruh Civil Rights Act by failing to comply with the ADA.

DEFENDANT'S CONTENTIONS: Defendant denied all of the contentions. Defendant contended that its motion to dismiss should be granted because it's website contains a list of "Accessible Amenities" and plaintiff did not contact them for additional information. Defendant also contended plaintiff failed to state a claim under the Unruh Act.

Result

Defendant's motion to dismiss was granted. Both of plaintiff's claims were dismissed with prejudice.


#137394

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390