This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

Government
Social Security Administration
Disability Insurance Benefits

Belia T. v. Andrew M. Saul

Published: Jul. 16, 2021 | Result Date: Jun. 16, 2021 | Filing Date: May 19, 2020 |

Case number: 2:20-cv-04513-PLA Summary Judgment –  Plaintiff

Judge

Paul L. Abrams

Court

CD CA


Attorneys

Plaintiff

Kristin E. Berk
(Law Office of Patricia L. McCabe)

Patricia L. McCabe
(Law Office of Patricia L. McCabe)


Defendant

Michael K. Marriott
(Social Security Administration)


Facts

Plaintiff Belia T. was born in 1955 and has past relevant work experience as a home attendant. In 2016, plaintiff filed applications for a period of disability, Disability Insurance Benefits, and Supplemental Security Income, alleging an inability to work since March 2013. Plaintiff's applications were denied. An Administrative Law Judge held that plaintiff was not under a disability from March 2013 through February 2019. The Appeals Council affirmed. Plaintiff filed an action seeking review of the Commissioner's denial of her applications for a period of disability, DIB, and SSI payments.

Contentions

PLAINTIFF'S CONTENTIONS: Plaintiff contended the ALJ erred in evaluating the medical evidence and opinions and in determining plaintiff's residual functional capacity by failing to give proper weight to evidence from the treating physician. Plaintiff contended the ALJ erred in determining plaintiff's severe impairments by basing his findings on the fact there were no imaging findings in the record regarding the severe upper extremities. Plaintiff contended the ALJ erred by evaluating plaintiff's subjective symptom testimony because the record did not show mild findings and failed to identify plaintiff's limited daily activities.

DEFENDANT'S CONTENTIONS: Defendant denied all of the contentions.

Result

Plaintiff's request for remand was granted and the decision of the Commissioner was reversed.


#137395

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390