This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

Consumer Law
Consumer Protection
Violation of Proposition 65

Ecological Rights Foundation v. Staples Inc., Bestbuy.com LLC, Wobbleworks Inc., and Does 1 through 10, inclusive

Published: Jul. 16, 2021 | Result Date: Jun. 21, 2021 |

Case number: CGC-20-584232 Settlement –  $10,750

Judge

Richard B. Ulmer Jr.

Court

San Francisco County Superior Court


Attorneys

Plaintiff

Brian Gaffney
(Law Offices of Brian Gaffney APC)

Fredric A. Evenson
(Ecology Law Center)


Defendant

Joseph Orzano
(Seyfarth Shaw LLP)


Facts

When consumers use 3D printers or 3D pens with filaments incorporating a styrene monomer, the filaments are heated by the 3D printers or 3D pens. These type of products release styrene into the air causing consumers to inhale styrene. Defendants Staples, Inc., Bustbuy.com, LLC, Wobbleworks, Inc. manufacture, market, distribute, and sell: (1) filaments - incorporating a styrene monomer including acrylonitrile-butadiene-styrene (ABS) filaments, polycarbonate ABS (PC-ABS) filaments, and high impact polystyrene (HIPS) filaments - intended to be used in the operation of 3D printers and 3D pens, as well as (2) 3D printers intended to be used with filaments incorporating a styrene monomer, and (3) 3D pens intended to be used with filaments incorporating a styrene monomer. Ecological Rights Foundation brought suit against defendants alleging defendants violated Proposition 65. Plaintiff also sought injunctive relief.

Contentions

PLAINTIFF'S CONTENTIONS: Plaintiff contended defendants violated Proposition 65 by failing to provide clear and reasonable warnings to consumers informing that the products will expose them to styrene, a chemical known to cause cancer. Plaintiff contended defendants had knowledge and intent that typical use of the products will expose consumers to styrene. Plaintiff contended defendants knowingly and intentionally exposed consumers to styrene without first giving clear and reasonable warnings to such individuals regarding the carcinogenicity of styrene.

DEFENDANTS' CONTENTIONS: Defendants denied all of the contentions.

Result

Staples settled for $10,750. Staples was required to place warnings on covered products and to warn to use the products in a well-ventilated area.


#137402

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390