Mark Ward, as an individual and on behalf of all others similarly situated v. Seagate US LLC, and Does 1 through 50, inclusive
Published: Oct. 1, 2021 | Result Date: Aug. 9, 2021 | Filing Date: Aug. 5, 2020 |Case number: 20CV368917 Settlement – $330,000
Judge
Court
Santa Clara County Superior Court
Attorneys
Plaintiff
Larry W. Lee
(Diversity Law Group PC)
Mai Tulyathan
(Diversity Law Group PC)
William L. Marder
(Polaris Law Group LLP)
Defendant
Thomas E. Geidt
(GBG LLP)
Jennifer P. Svanfeldt
(GBG LLP)
Aaron A. Hayes
(GBG LLP)
Facts
Mark Ward was formerly employed as an engineer for Seagate US LLC. Ward was considered a non-exempt employee, and was paid hourly. During his employment, Ward was routinely paid shift overtime wages, and various non-discretionary incentive wages, including shift premium wages. Ward, as an individual and on behalf of all others similarly situated, filed an action against Seagate to challenge systemic and illegal employment practices resulting in violations of the California Labor Code against employees of Seagate.
Contentions
PLAINTIFF CONTENTIONS: Plaintiffs contended that defendants acted intentionally and with deliberate indifference and conscious disregard to the rights of all employees by failing to pay sick pay at the regular rate of pay and by failing to keep accurate records as to plaintiffs. Plaintiffs also contended that defendants engaged in a system of willful violations of the California Labor Code and applicable Industrial Welfare Commission Wage Orders by creating and maintaining policies, practices and customs that knowingly denied employees the above stated rights and benefits. Specifically, defendants violated the Labor Code by failing to identify the applicable hourly rate of pay and corresponding hours worked whenever shift overtime and/or shift premium wages were paid. Instead, whenever said shift overtime and/or shift premium wages were paid to plaintiffs, defendants blatantly omitted both the applicable hourly rates of pay and hours worked used to calculate the corresponding wage statements.
DEFENDANT CONTENTIONS: Defendants denied the contentions.
Result
The case settled for $330,000.
For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:
Email
jeremy@reprintpros.com
for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390