This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

Antitrust
Fraud
Conspiracy

In re Glumetza Antitrust Litigation

Published: Oct. 8, 2021 | Result Date: Sep. 20, 2021 | Filing Date: Sep. 18, 2019 |

Case number: 3:19-cv-05822-WHA Settlement –  $453,850,000

Judge

William H. Alsup

Court

USDC Northern District of California


Attorneys

Plaintiff

Thomas M. Sobol
(Hagens, Berman, Sobol & Shapiro LLP)

Lauren G. Barnes
(Hagens Berman Sobol Shapiro LLP)

Jessica R. MacAuley
(Hagens Berman Sobol Shapiro LLP)

Rochella T. Davis
(Hagens Berman Sobol Shapiro LLP)

Shana E. Scarlett
(Hagens, Berman, Sobol & Shapiro LLP)

Steve D. Shadowen
(Hilliard & Shadowen LLP)

Richard Brunell
(Hilliard Shadowen LLP)

Tina J. Miranda
(Hilliard Shadowen LLP)

Matthew C. Weiner
(Hilliard & Shadowen LLP)

Joseph M. Vanek
(Sperling & Slater PC)

David P. Germaine
(Sperling & Slater PC)

Eamon P. Kelly
(Sperling & Slater PC)

Daniel Shmikler
(Sperling & Slater PC)

Alberto Rodriguez
(Sperling & Slater PC)

John P. Bjork
(Sperling & Slater PC)

Robert D. Cheifetz
(Sperling & Slater PC)


Defendant

Jay P. Lefkowitz
(Kirkland & Ellis LLP)

Devora Allon
(Kirkland & Ellis LLP)

Brian D. Sieve
(Kirkland & Ellis LLP)

James Hileman
(Kirkland & Ellis LLP)

Kevin T. Van Wart
(Kirkland & Ellis LLP)

Leiv H. Blad
(Lowenstein Sandler LLP)

Zarema A. Jaramillo
(Lowenstein Sander LLP)

Joshua E. Morris
(Lowenstein Sander LLP)

Meg T. Slachetka
(Lowenstein Sander LLP)


Facts

Plaintiffs Meijer Inc., BI-LO LLC, and other direct purchasers filed an antitrust class action lawsuit against defendants Bausch Health Companies Inc., Salix Pharmaceuticals Ltd., Santarus Inc., Assertio Therapeutics Inc., Lupin Ltd. and Lupin Pharmaceuticals Inc. Lupin sought approval for and planned to release its generic version of Glumetza, a diabetes medication that was marketed through a partnership between a Bausch Health subsidiary and Assertio Therapeutics Inc (previously Depomed).

Contentions

PLAINTIFFS' CONTENTIONS: Plaintiffs contended that Lupin agreed to delay sales of its generic version of Glumetza until February 2016 in exchange for a promise by Bausch and Assertio that they would not launch a competing "authorized" generic Glumetza for 12 months after Lupin began its sales. This had the effect of unlawfully prolonging Bausch and Assertio's monopoly for brand Glumetza and gave Lupin a monopoly on generic Glumetza for one year when it finally entered the market. The generic versions could have been on the shelves as early as December 2012 and the defendants' scheme delayed generic availability for several years, resulting in hundreds of millions of dollars in overcharges to direct purchasers and consumers.

DEFENDANTS' CONTENTIONS: Defendants denied all contentions.

Result

The case was settled for $453.85 million.

Other Information

Bausch Health Cos. Inc. and six of its business units settled the direct purchaser class case for $300 million, Assertio settled the direct purchaser class case for $3.85 million, and Lupin settled the direct purchaser class case for $150 million. Also, some class members, such as insurer Humana Inc. and retailers including CVS and Rite Aid, opted out to pursue their own case.


#137863

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390