This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

Real Property
Premises Liability

Gary Vedovitch, et al. v. Triton Air Inc.

Published: Oct. 22, 2021 | Result Date: Sep. 22, 2021 | Filing Date: May 3, 2017 |

Case number: 30-2017-00899728-CU-OR-CJC Verdict –  Defense

Judge

Lon F. Hurwitz

Court

Orange County Superior Court


Attorneys

Plaintiff

John B. Richards
(Law Office of John B. Richards)

William P. Frusetta
(Law Office of John B. Richards)


Defendant

Rey S. Yang
(Yang Professional Law Corp.)

Stephanie Guerra
(Yang Professional Law Corp.)


Experts

Plaintiff

Robin A. Bernhoft
(Environmental Medicine)

Sanjivan Kohli
(Pulmonary Medicine)

Jack Clausen
(Home Inspector)

Jeffrey S. Hughes
(General Contractor)

Defendant

Howard Sandler
(Occupational Medicine)

Brian P. Daly CIH
(Industrial Hygiene)

Facts

Plaintiffs, Gary Vedovitch, Rosalind Vedovitch, Kylynn Vedovitch, and Kiara Vedovitch (by and through her guardian ad litem Gal Rosalind Vedovitch), alleged that they were exposed to mold when they resided at a home in Laguna Niguel. Plaintiffs resided at the subject home between 2007 and August 30, 2011, and then between Oct. 1, 2012 and Nov. 21, 2016.
In August 2016, Gary Vedovitch advised the landlord that the air-conditioning unit was not functioning. On Aug. 16, 2016, defendant's HVAC service technician went to the attic and found a clogged condensate line in the air conditioning unit, resulting in excess water in the main drain pan. The rising water in the secondary drain pan, in turn, triggered the overflow safety switch thereby shutting-off the air conditioning unit.
According to Rosalind Vedovitch, during the service call, she asked the service technician if there was mold in the HVAC system, as she was concerned about mold due to standing water in the drain pan. According to her, the HVAC technician responded, "no mold," and she relied upon his representation that there was no mold in her home.
In late August 2016, plaintiff, Rosalind Vedovitch, sought medical treatment for respiratory issues, including pneumonia and lung infections. On Sept. 13, 2016, a medical bronchoscopy apparently showed Aspergillus mold/fungus presumably in her lung biopsy.
On Nov. 17, 2016, the landlord retained Jack Clausen, a home inspector, to inspect the home and obtained air samples throughout the home. The air test results apparently showed elevated levels of Aspergillus/Penicillium in various areas throughout the home. Clausen returned to the property in December 2016 and January 2017, and found that a rug saturated with dog urine in plaintiffs' master bedroom had elevated levels of Stachybotrys mold. Clausen did not observe any visible mold on the HVAC coils or drain pan.

Contentions

PLAINTIFF'S CONTENTIONS: Plaintiffs contend that they did not suspect that there were any issues with mold at their home until after the inspection by Clausen on Nov. 21, 2016. Plaintiffs contend that they relied upon the HVAC technician's representation that there was no mold in the HVAC unit, and that had he not made such representation, they would have requested that the landlord investigate for mold at the property.

DEFENDANT'S CONTENTIONS: Defendant contends that the communication between Rosalind Vedovitch and the technician relating to mold did not occur and that even if it did, the technician was correct in noting that there was no mold in the HVAC unit as all experts agreed that there was no visible mold or organic growth inside the unit.

Settlement Discussions

In November 2020, defendant served a statutory offer to compromise for $10,000. In February 2021, plaintiffs served a statutory offer to compromise for $1 million.

Damages

Plaintiffs sought $10 million for non-economic damages (pain and suffering).

Injuries

Plaintiff Rosalind Vedovitch, allegedly sustained Allergic Bronchopulmonary Aspergillosis, resulting in lung scarring and a dilating heart, shortening her life-span. Plaintiff Kylynn Vedovitch, allegedly sustained mold-induced asthma. Plaintiffs Gary Vedovitch and Kiara Vedovitch, allegedly sustained general damages.

Result

Defense verdict

Deliberation

Two hours

Poll

12-12

Length

4.5 weeks


#137892

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390