This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

Construction
Construction Defects

Homeowners v. General Contractors, Subcontractors

Published: Nov. 12, 2021 | Result Date: Jun. 23, 2021 | Filing Date: Nov. 21, 2019 |

Settlement –  $860,000

Mediator

Ross Hart

Court

San Diego County Superior Court


Attorneys

Plaintiff

William H. Naumann
(The Naumann Law Firm PC)

Loren K. Shiu
(The Naumann Law Firm PC)


Facts

Plaintiffs, a large group of single-family homes, filed a claim against the general contractor and several sub-contractors responsible for the construction of the project. The homes within the project included crawl spaces due to the elevations. Plaintiffs experienced musty odors within their homes and leaking windows leading them to engage the firm. Upon further investigation, plaintiffs' experts discovered the crawl spaces were not properly ventilated causing bio-organic growths in the crawl spaces, home interiors and musty odors within the home. Additionally, plaintiffs experts discovered improper window installation and roof membrane installation led to leaking through the windowsills and ceilings. Other defects included stucco cracking, drywall cracks, and miscellaneous code violations.

Contentions

PLAINTIFF'S CONTENTIONS: Plaintiffs contended that there were defects in the development, workmanship, repairs, materials, planning, design, engineering, and construction of their homes and improvements by the general contractor and subcontractors that violated Civil Code sections 895 et seq. As a result of the defective work, plaintiffs suffered damages including but not limited to the cost of repairing those defects.

DEFENDANT'S CONTENTIONS: Defendant denied all contentions.

Result

Following multiple mediations before mediator, Ross Hart, Esq., the parties agreed to settle the matter for $860,000.


#138017

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390