This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

Personal Injury
Dangerous Condition of Public Property
Negligence

Valerie A. Stevenson v. City and County of San Francisco, San Francisco Department of Public Works, and Does 1 through 50

Published: Dec. 3, 2021 | Result Date: Oct. 26, 2021 | Filing Date: Jul. 1, 2020 |

Case number: CGC-20-585157 Settlement –  $75,000

Judge

Samuel K. Feng

Court

San Francisco County Superior Court


Attorneys

Plaintiff

Mark J. Zanobini
(Law Office of Mark J. Zanobini PC)

Renata L. Bogomolnaya
(Law Office of Mark J. Zanobini PC)


Defendant

Renee L. Erickson
(Office of the San Francisco City Attorney)


Facts

On or about July 6, 2018, Valerie A. Stevenson was walking to the Golden Gate Transit bus stop on Sacramento Street in San Francisco. While in the crosswalk of California and Sansome Street, Stevenson tripped on a piece of uneven and raised asphalt, fell, and severely fractured her distal radius. She was rushed to St. Mary's Hospital by San Francisco Fire Department where she was treated for her injuries.

Contentions

PLAINTIFF'S CONTENTIONS: Plaintiff contended that the City and County of San Francisco was responsible for the maintenance and repair of the street where she fell; the City and County failed to warn of, prevent, or correct a dangerous condition on public property; that the City and County knew or should have known of the dangerous condition of the asphalt; that her injury was foreseeable and preventable had the City and County taken reasonable measures; and that the City's and County's failure to take these measures were a direct and proximate cause of her injuries.

DEFENDANT'S CONTENTIONS: Defendant contended that it was immune from liability under provisions of the California Government Code; that Plaintiff was comparatively negligent; and that Plaintiff had assumed the risks associated with her activity.

Injuries

Plaintiff suffered a comminuted displaced intraarticular fracture of the distal radius.

Result

This case was settled for $75,000.


#138150

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390