This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

Personal Injury
Wrongful Death
Failure to Adequately Warn

The Estate of B.H., John Herndon, J.H., a minor, T.H., a minor, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated v. Netflix Inc.

Published: Feb. 4, 2022 | Result Date: Jan. 11, 2022 |

Case number: 4:21-cv-06561-YGR Bench Decision –  Dismissal

Judge

Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers

Court

USDC Northern District of California


Attorneys

Plaintiff

Gregory Keenan
(Digital Justice Foundation)

Andrew Grimm
(Digital Justice Foundation)

Ryan A. Hamilton
(Hamilton Law LLC)


Defendant

Blanca F. Young
(Munger & Tolles & Olson LLP)

Jennifer L. Bryant
(Munger, Tolles & Olson LLP)

Cory M. Batza
(Munger, Tolles & Olson LLP)


Facts

In March 2017, Netflix released its series, 13 Reasons Why. The series was adapted from a popular novel of the same name, and it depicts the anecdotes described in audio recordings by the series' main character, Hannah Baker, explaining the reasons behind her suicide. In the novel, Baker's suicide is carried out via a pill overdose. Netflix's version, however, was a three-minute long scene of Baker slashing her wrists, suffering, and dying in a bathtub. The show quickly became a streaming hit, and it was the subject of much discussion and media coverage. In April 2017, John Herndon's minor daughter, B.H., committed suicide. Herndon filed suit against Netflix on behalf of himself and on behalf of all others similarly situated.

Contentions

PLAINTIFFS' CONTENTIONS: Plaintiffs contended that Defendant produced a product that posed a serious health risk to teens; that ordinary viewers would not have been aware of this risk; that Defendant failed to warn viewers, particularly younger viewers, of the dangers of viewing its series; that Defendant was negligent; that Defendant's negligence was the proximate cause of B.H.'s and numerous other teens' suicides; and that Plaintiffs had suffered irreparable harm as a result of these deaths. Plaintiffs further alleged that a 28.9 percent increase in child suicides in the month following the series' debut was attributable to the series.

DEFENDANT'S CONTENTIONS: Defendant denied all material allegations and any wrongdoing. Defendant further contended that the content and release of the series were acts in furtherance of its right to free speech in connection with an issue of public concern.

Result

The court granted Netflix Inc.'s Motion to Dismiss, holding that the series and its release were protected by California's anti-SLAPP statute, and therefore, Plaintiffs could not proceed with their claims.


#138363

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390