This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

Torts
Negligence and Negligence Per Se
Invasion of Privacy

Jaramey Stobbe v. Accellion Inc.

Published: Feb. 4, 2022 | Filing Date: Feb. 24, 2021 |

Case number: 5:21-cv-01353-EJD Settlement –  $8,100,000

Judge

Edward J. Davila

Court

USDC Northern District of California


Attorneys

Plaintiff

Tina Wolfson
(Ahdoot & Wolfson PC)

Robert R. Ahdoot
(Ahdoot & Wolfson PC)

Theodore W. Maya
(Ahdoot & Wolfson PC)

Andrew W. Ferich
(Ahdoot & Wolfson PC)

Ben Barnow
(Barnow & Associates PC)

Anthony L. Parkhill
(Barnow & Associates PC)


Defendant

Melanie M. Blunschi
(Latham & Watkins LLP)

Michael H. Rubin
(Latham & Watkins LLP)


Facts

Accellion Inc. is a Palo Alto-based company that provided the Accellion File Transfer Appliance to its clients, which included banks, law firms, universities, and healthcare organizations. For more than 20 years, Accelion FTA had been used by clients to securely transfer files that were too large to be sent via email. Accellion, however, developed a new platform, Kiteworks, and had decided to cease support for the FTA effective April 30, 2021. Prior to this date, Accellion encouraged customers to upgrade to Kiteworks, but many clients continued to use Accellion FTA. Then, in December 2020, two hacker groups exploited vulnerabilities in the FTA to gain unauthorized access to and download a significant amount of clients' data. A class action lawsuit was filed by Jaramey Stobbe on behalf of himself and on behalf of all others similarly situated who had been affected by the data breach.

Contentions

PLAINTIFFS' CONTENTIONS: Plaintiffs contended that defendant had possession of affected users' personal information and sensitive data, including names, dates of birth, Social Security numbers, and medical information; that defendant failed to properly protect users' information, specifically by failing to implement and maintain appropriate data security practices, to detect security vulnerabilities in the FTA, and to disclose that its security practices were inadequate to protect sensitive data; that plaintiffs had been harmed by their data being illegally accessed and downloaded; and that defendant's failure was the proximate cause of that harm.

DEFENDANT'S CONTENTIONS: Defendant denied all of plaintiffs' material allegations; and defendant contended that it was not responsible for maintaining and updating clients' instances of the FTA software; that it did not collect, access, or store the content of files shared via the FTA; and that it did not provide any guarantees to clients that the FTA software was secure.

Settlement Discussions

The parties engaged in two formal mediation sessions with the Honorable Jay C. Gandhi (Retired), but were unable to reach an agreement during those sessions. A settlement was eventually reached following further negotiations between the parties' counsel.

Result

A settlement was reached wherein Accellion admitted no wrongdoing but agreed to fund an $8.1 million settlement for class members. Accellion also agreed to retires its File Transfer Appliance offering; to expand its bug bounty program; to provide annual cybersecurity training to all employees; to employ personnel with formal responsibilities for cybersecurity; to maintain FedRAMP certification for its newer Kiteworks offering; and to periodically and publicly confirm compliance with the agreement on its website.


#138383

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390