This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

Personal Injury
Dangerous Condition
Slip and Fall

Anthony Wyatt v. Holder Construction, Does 1 through 100

Published: Feb. 18, 2022 | Result Date: Jan. 27, 2022 | Filing Date: Feb. 20, 2020 |

Case number: 20CV364136 Summary Judgment –  Defense

Judge

Christopher G. Rudy

Court

Santa Clara County Superior Court


Attorneys

Plaintiff

Gerald H. Scher
(Scher & Bassett)


Defendant

Robert J. Frassetto
(Frassetto Law LLP)

Dirk D. Larsen
(Frassetto Law LLP)

Mark Susson
(Susson Law APC)


Facts

In March 2018, Anthony Wyatt was working as a sound and communication technician on the construction of the Apple Park campus in Cupertino, California. As he was engaged in his duties, Wyatt slipped and fell on a temporary floor covering called Skudo, which is used to protect finished surfaces from construction site damage, that was not secured to the floor underneath. Wyatt sustained injuries from his fall, and he eventually filed suit against Holder Construction Group, LLC, alleging it was responsible for the unsecured flooring.

Contentions

PLAINTIFF'S CONTENTIONS: Plaintiff contended that defendant was responsible for the temporary flooring he slipped on, specifically that defendant had removed an upper layer of Skudo without making sure the layer left behind was secured to the floor, and that defendant's actions had caused his fall and injuries.

DEFENDANT'S CONTENTIONS: Defendant denied all of plaintiff's material allegations. Defendant further contended that the Skudo was not within its scope of work on the date of plaintiff's injury; that it had no duty to plaintiff and that it did not cause his injury; and that the Privette Doctrine barred plaintiff's claim against defendant, a general contractor at the construction project.

Result

The court granted summary judgment in favor of Holder Construction, finding that it had not affirmatively contributed to Wyatt's injury and did not direct or control Skudo-related work in a way that contributed to Wyatt's injury, so it could not be held liable for his fall.


#138423

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390