This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

Education Law
Individuals with Disabilities Education Act
Failure to Accommodate

Student A, by and through Parent A, her guardian; Student B, by and through Parent B, his guardian; Student C, by and through Parent C, his guardian; and Student D, by and through Parent D, her guardian, each one individually and on behalf of all other similarly situated children v. The Berkeley Unified School District; Donald Evans, in his official capacity as the Superintendent for the Berkeley Unified School District; Beatriz Leyva-Cutler, Ty Alper, Judy Appel, Josh Daniels, and Karen Hemphill, each in his or her official capacity as a director of the Berkeley Unified School District Board of Education; The Board of Education of the Berkeley Unified School District

Published: Apr. 8, 2022 | Result Date: Nov. 4, 2021 | Filing Date: May 2, 2017 |

Case number: 3:17-cv-02510-JST Settlement –  Non-monetary relief

Judge

Jon S. Tigar

Court

USDC Northern District of California


Attorneys

Plaintiff

Arlene B. Mayerson
(Disability Rights Education and Defense Fund Inc.)

Ramaah Sadasivam
(Disability Rights Education and Defense Fund Inc.)

Deborah R. Jacobson
(Jacobson Education Law Inc.)


Defendant

Annette L. Rose
(Gordon & Rees LLP)

Mark S. Posard
(Gordon & Rees LLP)

Beatriz Berumen
(California Dept. of Justice)


Facts

On May 2, 2017, four students with certain reading disorders, including dyslexia, filed a class action lawsuit against Berkeley Unified School District, its superintendent, individual directors of the Board of Education and the Board of Education of the Berkeley Unified School District.

Contentions

PLAINTIFFS' CONTENTIONS: Plaintiffs contended that defendants systemically declined to identify, evaluate and provide appropriate interventions and accommodations to students with reading disorders in a timely manner so that they would have the necessary tools required to process information and attain what is the foundational unit of all education: learning to read. This failure to provide legally-mandated services to schoolchildren with suspected disabilities and disabilities due to reading disorders, led to those children not being able to fully participate in their education as their nondisabled peers, throughout their years in the District, as was their right under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act, Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act, the Americans with Disabilities Act and California Education Code Sections 56000.

DEFENDANTS' CONTENTIONS: Defendants denied all contentions, noting that they followed applicable laws and regulations.

Result

The settlement requires Berkeley Unified School District to work with nationally recognized outside consultants to develop and implement a Literacy Improvement Plan to improve reading and language arts achievement for all students, especially those with or at risk for reading disabilities, including, among others: providing professional development for all staff and administrators; identifying students at risk for reading disabilities through universal screening; using universal screening to inform early intervention; monitoring implementation with reports to the school board; and paying $350,000 in attorney fees.


#138659

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390