Efren Moreno v. Capital Building Maintenance & Cleaning Services Inc.
Published: Apr. 15, 2022 | Result Date: Sep. 10, 2021 | Filing Date: Oct. 28, 2019 |Case number: 4:19-cv-07087-DMR Settlement – $325,000
Judge
Court
USDC Northern District of California
Attorneys
Plaintiff
Joseph D. Sutton
(Advocates for Worker Rights LLP)
Marco A. Palau
(Advocates for Worker Rights LLP)
Eric S. Trabucco
(Advocates for Worker Rights LLP)
Tomas E. Margain
(Justice at Work Law Group)
Defendant
Azniv Darbinian
(Gordon & Rees LLP)
Mollie M. Burks
(Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani LLP)
Facts
Capital Building Maintenance & Cleaning Services, Inc., provides various labor services, including window washing, construction cleanup, floor maintenance, pressure washing, trash removal, and graffiti removal, among others. Efren Moreno is a former unionized employee of Capital Building. Moreno and other Capital Building employees received an hourly wage rate negotiated by their representatives in the Northern District Council of Laborers. Moreno filed a class action lawsuit against Capital Building. The action was brought on behalf of all hourly employees who received two wage statements, one of which did not properly list the union designated regular rate of pay.
Contentions
PLAINTIFF'S CONTENTIONS: Plaintiff alleged violations of the Fair Labor Standards Act, the California Labor Code, and the California Unfair Competition Law. Plaintiff alleged that defendant improperly calculated his overtime wages based on a reduced regular rate rather than the actual regular rate set by his union contract. For example, plaintiff's regular rate of pay was $22.73 per hour but his overtime rate was only $27.00 per hour. Plaintiff claimed that he received a check and wage statement for his regular hours and a separate check and wage statement for his overtime hours, and the wage statement for his overtime hours did not list his regular rate of pay. Plaintiff also alleged that defendant's pay system did not properly record all hours worked because the system rounds time into half hour intervals rather than reflecting the actual amount of time worked. As a result, workers were not paid for all of the hours they worked.
DEFENDANT'S CONTENTIONS: Defendant denied all contentions.
Settlement Discussions
The parties reached a settlement agreement through mediation before Jeffrey Ross.
Result
The case settled for $325,000.
For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:
Email
jeremy@reprintpros.com
for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390